Sandra Ade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2018
- Messages
- 42
- Reaction score
- 308
YepThat makes sense. XK could have gone downstairs to pick up her DD at the front door.
<moo>
YepThat makes sense. XK could have gone downstairs to pick up her DD at the front door.
<moo>
BBM for focusI agree completely re prosecutorial misconduct. Easy sources for those who would like to research further.
Search The Marshall Project’s archives
The Marshall Project is a nonprofit news organization covering the U.S. criminal justice system.www.themarshallproject.orgInnocence Project
We work to free the innocent, prevent wrongful convictions, and create fair, compassionate, and equitable systems of justice for everyone.innocenceproject.org
I also want to respond to the 'real killer' talk re framing, sheath, etc. I am one of the people who raised those points, not because I believe them but because dots were being connected that did not connect (eg; BK's car was seen so BK as driving - this requires an assumption, albeit a pretty logical one). I highlighted some of the issues because this is where the defense may seek to raise doubt. when there is a possible question, there can be doubt. reasonable or not is the big issue. enough doubts raised, the bigger the pool of doubt goes. In BK's case, the PCA is imo jmo not enough for bard. ICBW.
Do I think he did it? Yes.
Do I feel BARD has been met? No.
And all it takes is one juror to vote not guilty BARD.
They are gathering evidence, this is why they asked to delay the preliminary hearing.
They will present evidence, they are requesting 4 or 5 days for the hearing.
Appreciate this!He has no alibi. No one framed him. He is just another psycho. There really is no more to it.
With all that stabbing, there is a 99.9% chance that he cut himself and bled at the scene.
It's him. Only him.
He will plead and take life in prison with out the possibility of parole over the jurors' recommendation of execution.
His family will talk him into it to save everyone further trauma.
JMHO
People are very naive.I cringe every time I hear someone say "I have nothing to hide! I'll tell them everything! They can track all my movements and have all my records!"
Lots of innocent people with 'nothing to hide' have sat behind bars and continue to sit behind bars to this day.
I'd like to think he'd take the smart, less traumatic option and plea out in exchange for life imprisonment, like Gary Ridgway did.He has no alibi. No one framed him. He is just another psycho. There really is no more to it.
With all that stabbing, there is a 99.9% chance that he cut himself and bled at the scene.
It's him. Only him.
He will plead and take life in prison with out the possibility of parole over the jurors' recommendation of execution.
His family will talk him into it to save everyone further trauma.
JMHO
What would their motive be for presenting evidence at the preliminary hearing? The judge isn’t going to be swayed to their side by a battle of the experts.
Let’s consider a recent preliminary hearing, the supposed murder of Maya Millete. Still Missing - CA - Maya Millete, 39, missed daughter's birthday, Chula Vista, 7 Jan 2021 *husband arrested* #5
It’s in another state, and its a no-body case, so many things are different. However, it took nine days of testimony, the defense cross-examined like mad, (no pun intended,) but the defense did not call any witnesses. I believe that’s quite typical for prelims.
MOO
I agree. And one reason the house was idea is that it housed young women he could attack.I'm not convinced that he stalked any individual(s) in a conventional sense and other than media narrative, nothing has been presented to convince me it's fact.
I'm leaning toward the fact that he was looking to kill and the house itself provided what he felt was the ideal location to carry out his plan.
I'm home alone right now, and my internet history would show that, both in terms of the Wifi network I'm using and my browser and text history. My floodlight camera would show what time I came home and put the car in the garage for the night. Chris Watts was caught in part because his neighbor caught him backing his truck into his garage very early in the morning, which he had never done before. That said, I don't think it's possible to "always" prove innocence, or there wouldn't be innocent people in prison. But the same technology that allows law enforcement to spot criminals via surveillance cameras, license plate readers, GPS could also help an innocent person.He could present:
- a cctv and his signature from a gym if he claimed he attended it that night
-a cctv and a receipt from a night store if he claimed he went there
- a statement from a friend if he claimed he visited this person that night
Etc, etc
A person can always prove one's innocence, provided it is true.
Wherever we go, we leave some traces.
As he left his at murder scene.
JMO
It's a lawyer who wants to be able to get media attention.I don't recall the victims families being part of the gag order. JMO
It's pretty hard to argue the car and his phone (!) were stolen when the car was in his possession the next morning.jmo imo he could say he never knew. it's only once he was accused that he realizes this must be what happened, and off the hook for reporting them stolen. imo jmo. I don't believe that's whaat happened, but can I prove it? no. I'm hoping that if he's guilty, the prosecution can prove it bard. I hope they have physical evidence placing him in the house - blood, please or hair. something other than touch dna. jmo imo
he is not glued to his car, so they need to prove the he was in the car. jmo imo. what seems logical 'of course he was in it' can't jut be assumed at trial. esp with the theft issues with Elantras. Kia and Hyundai under Fire from Cities, Insurers over Too Easily Stolen Vehicles
I think it would be worse for him if he lied about an alibi and then couldn't prove it.imo jmo.
It's a lawyer who wants to be able to get media attention.
I don't believe there is much to be made of it. It has been said multiple times that even if the roommate had done something differently, the victim's wounds were so catastropic that none could have been saved.
At this point, we still actually don't know what the roommate saw or heard except brief mention in the PCA and much of it appears to be backed by their phone records and within that information may be a lot more information on her perception of events that evening. I very strongly doubt that anyone rolled over and went to sleep believing that people were being murdered in their home.
Even if the situation played out as people have speculated, there aren't many college students that have discovered their roommates slaughtered on a Sunday morning and if we take the PCA literally, the sounds she believes she heard, in no way warranted a 911 call.
There are three events are happening simultaneously at approx 4am. Door dash -- something waking DM -- KG making noise upstairs. It seems to me that BK was inside the house. <moo> ....
Hi @CeskaJust who are these so-called "sources close to the investigation"? I saw basically the same thing reported on News Nation (Banfield). If they have a source, they should name it, otherwise, IMO, it's just hearsay.
Idaho victim Xana Kernodle fought back against alleged killer Bryan Kohberger: report
Slain University of Idaho student Xana Kernodle fought back against alleged killer Bryan Kohberger — suffering noticeable defensive wounds on her hands, a report said.nypost.com
BK planned to kill while avoiding any dangers and difficult situations that could arise....
But for me, coward will do fine.
Except certain details conflict with what police have stated. Respectfully, I will stick with the facts from law enforcement.Hi @Ceska
Respectfully, news, journalists, etc do not reveal their sources, without permission.
there is a good reason for this, I’m sure you know why.
just like, whistleblowers remain anonymous…
witnesses remain anonymous
etc…
I can respect the logic behind this
edited to add… I have to make the decision, fact check and so on if I take the word of the press , respectfully
Thanks. This explains why the defense is saying they have no evidence to turn over to the prosecution at this time.