I’m getting Richard Speck vibes from this.
It’s weird that you say this, but I’m getting something sort of like this too.
When I first heard about this crime I thought it’s an X or something similar. He will be in custody by the end of the week etc. But after a week with no arrest my thinking started to change. Clearly, it’s not someone super close to them because there must have been a ton of evidence at the scene and some marks left on the perpetrator so an ex or a well-known stalker would have been caught right away. My current thoughts are now (I know this is not a popular theory):
- This is something much more along the lines of a thrill killing with a sexual component for whoever did it. I know there was no evidence of direct sexual assault, but the act of doing this is sexually stimulating to this type of offender much the same way setting fires is sexually stimulating to a serial arsonist.
- Many/most people here think this was a carefully planned out meticulously carried out crime. This is understandable, but I think this will end up being a case of a killer getting lucky appearing to be good. I think this was an impulsive crime of opportunity. Offender may have or taken interest in one of the victims, maybe even snooped around before, but I think his decision to act, and to act at the time he did was impulsive and opportunistic and he was more likely than not intoxicated.
- If the offender is known at all to the victims it will only be tangentially.
- there may have been some stalking going on but it will have been much more of the spying peeping literally stalking variety, and not the incel harass you into being my GF type of stalking. He was always looking for victims not a girlfriend.
- He did not know the inside of the house well and had likely never been inside. I think he came in though the second floor back sliding glass door and went room to room killing. I think he didn't know about the people downstairs and that’s why they are still alive.
-He was at the time if the crimes residing within walking distance of the crime scene. (Doesn’t have to be permanent residence).
-He is definitely a HE.
-This offender is dangerous and will do something like this again if he is not caught.
-would not surprise me if this is his first major offense, but he likely has a criminal record for petty stuff and substance abuse issues.
*** these are all just my current speculations and i know this is not a popular theory. Any or all could easily be wrong.