abcdefgihavetogo
Member
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2022
- Messages
- 4
- Reaction score
- 79
this is how I interpreted it. her dad keepscould this potentially mean either M or K actually had a different cause of death from the others - for example blunt force trauma to the head? Then the knife work was saved for the possible "target" & remaining two -- with the target individual sustaining far more "attention" than others.
saying “their/they” and I feel like he’s referring to X & E vs K & M’s causes of death don’t match and that the killer didn’t have to go up the stairs and make the choice to kill K & M because K’s dad believes E/X were the targets.
MOO - K & M clearly arrived home after E & X. what if K & M saw a guy outside the house or could possibly be “witnesses” to someone or something that seemed out of place upon arriving home. and the killer knew this so made the choice to kill them too in order for them to not be able to provide any sort of eye witness the following day? Just my thought.