Charlot123
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2018
- Messages
- 8,982
- Reaction score
- 60,253
Why is that relevant though? MPD says no evidence was found on the dog and it was released to the private party a month ago. Even if the perpetrator's DNA was on the dog (unlikely imo) it is long gone now.
JMO - the dog collar and even fir should have been swabbed for DNA. But if it wasn’t done, you are right, it is way too late. I just thing the dog could have been a witness. The way I understood it, there was no blood on the dog, no fibers, so LE came to the conclusion that the dog did not enter the crime scene. The opposite question, could the dog have been taken away from that room before murders, is not discussed. The officers took M to the “animal services” per the article. I’d rather they took her to the crime lab and swabbed but - I wasn’t there and don’t know if the dog was on a different floor altogether. Not much is told to us about where the dog was. Idaho police offer new details about Kaylee Goncalves’ dog at the crime scene