That is what I have been doing - just reading the tweets by the person tweeting...
(I don't know how to lose this BUF artifact-sorry)
The reason I like to see some relevant tweets here is because following the trusted tweeters annoys me if I'm not following everything they are.
For example, I chose NOT to follow the Moscow Murders. I just follow occasional cases because they personally grab me. I fell in love with JJ instantly because I really like people with some of the typical personality traits of ASD- they tend to be very literal, very honest, and very independent in decision making- social or peer pressure is less to them then their own internal deliberations.
Quickly in the early case, JJ was ID as having ASD, and his mother appeared very dishonest, and very invested in what others thought of her. I intuited that parenting JJ when he was younger could be a great "show" for others to watch and admire Lori, but as he got older, her superficiality and lies would be in conflict with JJ's blunt honesty. I was sucked in.
I have changed my mind about some things- I think Lori is more complex than simple narc- she also seems to think she is being righteous when she is committing (allegedly- IMO) horrific crimes. I wasn't expecting such religiosity with deep devotion/delusion. I would have expected an appearance of a "good Mormon mom" and nothing of religious substance underneath. (Not saying at all that her faith resembles other LDS people!)
I consider her co-conspirator at least as guilty.
All that is to say, I'm not really a true crime buff. I just latch into a few cases.
So a true crime creator- even my favorites- have a lot of tweets about cases which I am not following so I don't like to follow their social media.
So I appreciate those tweet posts.
MOO