It seems like the defense has been trying to paint this picture of LVD as someone with strong and sincerely held religious beliefs -- which where are then, presumably, used by CD to manipulate her.
"It seems like the defense has been trying to paint this picture of LVD as someone with strong and sincerely held religious beliefs -- which where are then, presumably, used by CD to manipulate her."
Yes, definitely.
I think there's also the introduction of the idea that she was (or believed she was) on a legit "mission from God," including having been given guidance by other-world beings highly revered by LDS members. She was told to go to a temple, and get a message, and sure enough, she got the message from someone who was exactly what she had been led to expect. That might resonate with an LDS person on the jury who believes in spiritual guidance -- Lori was being guided by God, and following the guidance.
There is also the idea of her being actively devoted to helping others prepare for hard times ahead -- including Biblical end-of-days concepts -- might also buy some positive connection.
It still doesn't seem like those should be enough to counter evidence of her involvement in murders, especially of her own kids, actions that seemed to be significantly motivated by money, sex, and power. But I think they want to open the door to the contrasting idea that (at least in theory) she might have been trying to act solely out of a desire to carry out her Heaven-sent mission.
In general, I don't think it's persuasive enough of an idea to turn the trial in her favor, BUT she only needs one LDS juror who does take it at face value. I think that's the defense's purpose in all this.
Last edited: