Nosurprise
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2020
- Messages
- 439
- Reaction score
- 3,561
Means at it again..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Means at it again..
Does anyone know why he would be there? Thank you.Local update: MM is back at the women’s detention center today.
Means at it again..
Log into Facebook | FacebookWhere is that linked from? I'm not seeing it and have a hard time reading this
Log into Facebook | Facebook. from Justin lumWhere is that linked from? I'm not seeing it and have a hard time reading this
Log into Facebook | Facebook. from Justin lum
No...Thanks. I can't find it on the portal under that case number. Any idea why it's not in the portal?
No Judge Boyce has resealed it..maybe someone else can explain it better.From the article
"EastIdahoNews.com filed a public record request asking Boyce to unseal the order to seal, which was granted Friday. The motion to compel and 169 attached pages are still sealed and, at this time, EastIdahoNews.com is not publishing the information to protect the integrity of the case."
Curious when those 169 pages will be released if Boyce granted the request on Friday
This is what we talked about at the end of the last thread. What was unsealed was an order sealing the motion made by MM. We (the public) are allowed to know that MM made a motion but we aren't allowed to know it's contents.From the article
"EastIdahoNews.com filed a public record request asking Boyce to unseal the order to seal, which was granted Friday. The motion to compel and 169 attached pages are still sealed and, at this time, EastIdahoNews.com is not publishing the information to protect the integrity of the case."
Curious when those 169 pages will be released if Boyce granted the request on Friday
This is what we talked about at the end of the last thread. What was unsealed was an order sealing the motion made by MM. We (the public) are allowed to know that MM made a motion but we aren't allowed to know it's contents.
What EIN is telling us is that the motion contained a crapload of evidence (169 pgs worth). They got to see the motion and its contents before it got sealed.
Maybe it’s in Chad’s portal.Thanks. I can't find it on the portal under that case number. Any idea why it's not in the portal?
Sorry better page 2 and 3..means..
Maybe it’s in Chad’s portal.
Oh the one I saw (linked in the thread previously) I thought it said the sealed stuff was unsealed only for the new prosecutor to see it, not EIN. This is so confusing.From the article
"EastIdahoNews.com filed a public record request asking Boyce to unseal the order to seal, which was granted Friday. The motion to compel and 169 attached pages are still sealed and, at this time, EastIdahoNews.com is not publishing the information to protect the integrity of the case."
Curious when those 169 pages will be released if Boyce granted the request on Friday