- Joined
- Nov 11, 2009
- Messages
- 8,253
- Reaction score
- 7,052
I received a reply from Clyde Knight:
I replied back as follows:
Suggestion to fellow sleuthers:
When calling in possibles, If Clyde Knight is the listed contact, I suggest that you look for an alternative contact. Despite the patronizing "While I appreciate your attention to these cases" verbage, he doesn't appear to have much regard for our communications.
As indicated in our many past emails to each other, while I appreciate your attention to these cases I do not have the authority to divulge the status of any MP/UP case to anyone who has not already been briefed by the investigating detective. If you have been debriefed please refer back to that detective for any further information. The cases that you refer to are ongoing active cases being investigated by law enforcement and the appropriate medical examiner's office. Thank you for your time
I replied back as follows:
<< As indicated in our many past emails to each other ...>
For the record, I have three previous communications from you, none of which pertained to your authority (or lack thereof) to divulge MP/UP status.
One was to refer me to the NCMEC regarding duplicate MP casefiles, and the other two were to explain why you wouldn't correct obvious errors in an MP casefile.
Suggestion to fellow sleuthers:
When calling in possibles, If Clyde Knight is the listed contact, I suggest that you look for an alternative contact. Despite the patronizing "While I appreciate your attention to these cases" verbage, he doesn't appear to have much regard for our communications.