CloudedTruth
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
- Messages
- 325
- Reaction score
- 937
Thank you! So I did watch on Amazon Prime last night. All I can say is that it's quite obviously very one-sided and heavily biased. Interviews only with cherry picked "experts" who agree with the R narrative of the intruder theory. It relies very heavily on portraying the Boulder PD as the bad guys, who set out from moment one to target the R's and never seriously consider anyone else. And Lou Smit is the hero of the story with an impeccable reputation not to be questioned, who fought everyone to find justice. It's a pretty shallow recounting that while pretending to uncover the truth, merely touches the surface and attempts to put a polish on that never addresses how the facts simply do no support the intruder theory.You’re most welcome!
In particular the team from the UK who emphatically claimed that JB was alive and struggling with the garrote, convinced that there were marks that prove she was clawing at it. Number one, those marks have been explained and were not proven to be what they claim, number two they completely ignore the facts of the post mortem forensic findings of the head injury that very strongly point to it occurring first. Those findings are not even mentioned or discussed most likely because they are difficult to dispute. It was seriously laughable. There are many other moments such as this that simply do not hold up because they only present a small piece of the reality.
A moment with JR that stood out to me was when he and PR are being interviewed in 1998, and he talks about the differences between this instance and the death of his oldest daughter Elizabeth. He spoke about the finality of the car accident and there not being anything he could do, but with JB he wanted "to make it right". It reminded me of PR's plea to Pam Griffin, "can't you fix this for me"? Followed by, "we didn't mean for this to happen". Just odd statements to make IMO. How do you "make it right"? In my mind, it points to a feeling of responsibility that whatever happened he now needs to try and fix.
And then an older JR responding to criticism of BR during the Dr. Phil interview and how he smiled through the whole interview, even during very serious questions. He defended it by saying BR is a happy guy who smiles all the time while he talks, and that JR does the same. Another rather laughable moment. So BR is so happy that he smiles while discussing the murder of his sister? Most people would call that inappropriate and perhaps a sign of deception. And I certainly don't recall JR smiling while answering similar questions about the murder of his daughter. That should've been either left alone or instead an acknowledgement of how that looked and a more reasonable explanation of BR's personality quirks. But that may have opened the can of why he is so socially awkward, which raises again all the questions surrounding him and whether or not he has a mental or emotional disorder. "The lady does protest too much, methinks".