HELEN MARIE GREEN has a Charleyproject profile now.
HELEN MARIE GREEN has a Charleyproject profile now.
So this was posted a bit more upthread but I took a look at it and I want to bring it back up to the surface.
The reconstruction almost looks spot on
5'4, skeletal remains, Helen is not on the rule-out list. Found in 1973.
If Helen's in CODIS then I'm guessing that it's a rule-out by default. But it still looks like something someone might want to look into.
I could see it. She's slightly younger than the minimum age, though.
THis is the only link I could find about St. Parish JD
http://canyouidentifyme.org/StMartinParishLouisianaJaneDoeDecember1981
She had a blood alcohol content of .3 when she died. That's insane! I've heard of people dying from alcohol poisoning at .25
I hope they're not making ruleouts on the basis of such an untested technology.
Hello, I was making a few posts about some matches I sent in recently and Helen was one of them.
I actually sent it in the day before roselvr just posted, only july 27. I hope we get some news soon, I was "working" on this case for a few days straight.
https://identifyus.org/en/cases/5703
If both the missing person and unidentified remains have DNA available in CODIS, they would be automatically compared, however, the missing person will not be put on the rule out list unless it's a manual comparison. I've confirmed this with a NamUs rep. This should save time in future searches. It's the second place I check now (after looking at the rule out list).
I'm thinking with the recent developments hinted at in this case that the DNA comparison is not with a current or known Jane Doe with a completed DNA profile in NamUs, but maybe someone more recent, or it falls along the lines of an Anita Drake scenario. Sending positive thoughts to Helen and her family. Thank you, Rose and SSA for keeping us up to date.
Thanks for the reply, Im a little confused. So they (in this case helen) should have already been compared (since they are both in namus), but just not listed under the jane does exclusion list unless someone manually checks then against each other? Is that correct?
And what's the second place to look at besides the exclusion list?
I've been in namus constantly the past couple weeks, I don't want to miss anything on how to use it!
Thank you!
SSA and I believe Helen has been found, we are waiting on DNA confirmation. Out of respect for and at the request of family we can not release any details at this time.
Helen and her family are in our prayers
Hello, I was making a few posts about some matches I sent in recently and Helen was one of them.
I actually sent it in the day before roselvr just posted, only july 27. I hope we get some news soon, I was "working" on this case for a few days straight.
https://identifyus.org/en/cases/5703
View attachment 121255