Forensic DNA collection. Very interesting...http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/pageDocuments/I6W7Q3D7RM.pdf
An unforgettable case, 10 year old Jessica Ridgeway of CO was on her way to school early one morning but never showed up.
It was as if she just disappeared into thin air.
LE went throughout her neighborhood knocking on doors and searched residences and took DNA samples.
Austin Sigg lived with his mother in another neighborhood so I don't believe his DNA was on file but other evidence led to him. Since LE had DNA to compare, they collected his sample and it turned out the match.
In the meantime, all those other people gave their DNA.
If they were poi's for any reason, they were outruled prior to the arrest of AS.
Most people cooperate but when they don't or won't, I believe it is like you suggest, they end up looking suspicious.
Anyway, there was another case I remember when LE set up a long table outside a shopping area or Village Hall and male residents walking by were asked to submit a DNA sample.
Most cooperated because they wanted to help solve the case and had nothing to hide.
Therefore, it seems the procedure is allowable for LE to carry out.
Does anyone know the law or policy behind when LE resorts to deliberately collecting citizens' DNA samples?
If asked everyone has a legal right to say 'no' however most who have nothing to hide will willingly give the DNA sample so they can be ruled out.
If the DNA sample is wanted by LE on a person who will not agree to give one if they are arrested then of course the DA will go before a Judge and he/she will sign off on an order that the suspect must give a DNA sample along with a collection of head and pubic hairs most of the time.
'
However; police are getting much more smarter in legal ways to obtain DNA. If anyone throws something in a trash can in a public area it can be picked up by LE to be tested for a DNA profile. Many suspects today are being arrested because the police had them under surveillance to see if they would throw anything away and they did leading to a DNA profile match. Many times they have gotten DNA from a throwaway coffee cup, cigarette etc. Once they have a DNA match then of course an arrest is made. I have seen them still go before the Judge and ask for a DNA profile once the suspect in jail. That cuts down on any defense attorney saying the DNA sample may have been contaminated when the item was tossed in the trash.
Anyone's personal trash become public property once the trashcan is sat out on the curb for the garbage man to pick up. The owner of the trash no longer has rights to what they threw away.
So imo, if LE has any suspicions about any suspects if they want to collect their DNA they will find a way even if they declined to give their DNA sample.
IMO
Forensic DNA collection. Very interesting...http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/pageDocuments/I6W7Q3D7RM.pdf
I am from that area, I know a lot of LE that worked the case. To clarify facts, LE did not take DNA from everyone who's home they searched. Austin Sigg was 17, and the FBI profiling the case, said they were looking for a male, adult between 25-35. They solved the case because Sigg's mother turned him in. Not through obtaining his DNA, which he gave to them after confessing to the crime. Nor did they tie him to it through any other means other than his mom noticing something, questioning him, him telling her, and then her calling the police. After his mom called the police during an initial search of his mother's home they found some of Jessica's body parts. The DNA wasn't really needed at that point.
There's lots of other missing persons cases going on right now, take a break for awhile and look into some of them.
We aren't going to hear much more on this case until they get those videos enhanced, analyzed and public. The presser was a disappointment today. Maybe over the weekend they will release stills shots from the cameras.
Sounds right to me, steelman. Thank you so much for the map and the screen caps of the location. It sounds like it may have been a drug deal going down type scenario. So, one or two of the three may have been there with a quantity of drugs that would be trouble for them to lose or get caught with in a car. Either one or two of them may have been buyers who chose to meet the dealer there, out of sight and possibly locals who knew the area, I agree with you there too. I agree with you about the Lt. Gliniewicz not sounding like he was heading into an unpredictable situation until the perps tried to avoid him.
If there was a deal going down with a supply involved, then maybe the chase was a way to get him off the track of the area of the deal and isolated, so the dealer/s could get back to their car, while the local buyer/s hoofed it back to someplace close by where they went unnoticed, as you suggest. All that being said, if the videos could help in identifying them and haven't yet been made available to the public to help with tips, could it be that LE may not want to tip off the perps.
steelman's map for Lt. "GI Joe" Fox Lake
Well, technically, 128 Honing Road would be the gate at which the Officer stopped his car. I believe that is point "J" on steelman's excellent map.I'm talking about point b on the aerial map. It's a bit of a distance from 128. Are you sayin we shouldn't fine tune maps as more detailed information becomes available?
An unforgettable case, 10 year old Jessica Ridgeway of CO was on her way to school early one morning but never showed up.
It was as if she just disappeared into thin air.
LE went throughout her neighborhood knocking on doors and searched residences and took DNA samples.
Austin Sigg lived with his mother in another neighborhood so I don't believe his DNA was on file but other evidence led to him. Since LE had DNA to compare, they collected his sample and it turned out the match.
In the meantime, all those other people gave their DNA.
If they were poi's for any reason, they were outruled prior to the arrest of AS.
Most people cooperate but when they don't or won't, I believe it is like you suggest, they end up looking suspicious.
Anyway, there was another case I remember when LE set up a long table outside a shopping area or Village Hall and male residents walking by were asked to submit a DNA sample.
Most cooperated because they wanted to help solve the case and had nothing to hide.
Therefore, it seems the procedure is allowable for LE to carry out.
Does anyone know the law or policy behind when LE resorts to deliberately collecting citizens' DNA samples?
Thanks for your input. Sorry if I stated the details from JR's case wrong. Sigg was 17 anyway. My point was her's was a case that came to mind when DNA collection took place. No judgment or opinion on my part.
As far as Lt. CG's case goes, contact the different media outlets because some of them made it sound as if LE went around collecting DNA samples today. One outlet reports dozens and dozens and another reported over 50 had been collected earlier today.
Again, no judgment from me if it helps solve the case.
Don't jump all over posts though please because this isn't a fight but is starting to feel like one is brewing around here.
I, like others, am trying to participate is all.
I asked a question because I don't know the answer. If the authorities come to your door and tell you that they want to take your DNA, do you have the right to say no? I never said I would say no, or anything like that. And what I meant by a person saying no, I would imagine that people would look at you suspiciously because you said no to the request.
Not sure if this has been posted but sounds promising. http://m.nwherald.com/2015/09/04/significant-evidence-found-in-fox-lake-officer-shooting/akw772x/
Not sure if this has been posted but sounds promising. http://m.nwherald.com/2015/09/04/significant-evidence-found-in-fox-lake-officer-shooting/akw772x/
Let me explain. POINT B was added because 100 Honing was originally believed to be tbe crime scene. POINT B is closer to the intersection of Precision. We now know POINTJ is the location of the shooting/crime scen and closer to the former plant as well as closer to a parking lot area. For the map to be more accurate, POINT B should be removed and POINT J should be updated to reflect the location of tbe shooting as that is the update on tbe newly released link for FBI tips. It's not unusual to update changes like that because it gives us a better idea of where the perps were escaping from. And it gives us a better idea of tbe distance between Precision Chrome (owner interviewed on msm as a possible witness) and the crime scene. Which we know isa greater djstance than when it was believed the crime scene was at POINT B. I hope that makes sense, because I don't think I could make it more clear. My apologies for not being clear in my earlier post.</p>Well, technically, 128 Honing Road would be the gate at which the Officer stopped his car. I believe that is point "J" on steelman's excellent map. The Prairie Material - Yard 23 (the old cement plant) property consists of 17 acres of land. Officer Gliniewicz's body (or "remains", as Felinko referred to it today) was found on the 128 Honing property in the approximate location shown in steelman's map. Its all 128 Honing. If you look at the map in an enlarged view you can clearly see that Google Maps has further identified the cement plant. I don't know how to describe it any better. The information is there already. Except there is no signpost that says 128.
Until today's presser, I had heard nothing about a reward. Motorola Solutions is one of the few remaining pieces of a long local company, headquartered an hour south in Schaumburg. Motorola had a big presence in Libertyville until recently, a half hour southeast. There are still many Motorola employees/ex-employees in the area. It was a little strange to see the Motorola exec at the presser, but not too much of a stretch. Felt a bit like sticking their nose in the spotlight with some money, but I'm certainly not saying they shouldn't do it.
First I've heard too. Wisconsin is only 20 min to the north and Fox Lake borders the state line. I've seen WI LE and MSM in the area since the beginning.There weren't any follow-up questions asked of the reporter nor did the reporter elaborate - she simply slipped in a comment about LE looking into something up in Wisconsin.
Since then I haven't heard Wisconsin mentioned again during further news reports on abc or other channels.
Very interesting and a little confusing. If they have picture(s), why not broadcast them? Unless it might spook a local to flee. Any clue from the report specifically when the pictures were shown to the condo people? Or where the condo was?Am watching the CBS news and they stated and spoke to two individuals from a condo complex. They stated LE came and showed them a picture of an African American, asking them if they knew him. The reporter stated that LE sources have stated several photos have been put together through leads. They then said its unknown where the photo came from or how it is connected.
No link as this just aired on the 8am news.