golfmom
Former Member
I saved a copy of the 2nd amended complaint. Would it be o.k. for me to post it here?
Golfmom, here is my point this is from the Chicago Mag article you posted, I do find the article interesting, hadn't seen it before:
"Other family members were less comfortable. They urged Kevin to hire an attorney. But after briefly talking to one lawyer, Kevin dismissed the idea. "I felt like I had nothing to hide," he says, and he worried that hiring an attorney might make him look guilty."
I hope you understand why I am starting to question the "other side" of events. Be sure though, I haven't "gone completely to the dark side"
It just seems shannanagans are being played on both sides.
Here is another quote from the same article that basically states the DNA was tested but then sent to the FBI, I guess I am asking how did they "Hide the DNA" when KZ admits there was a 9 month backlog and it would seem she knew where it was the whole time?: "But after the initial testing by the state crime lab, with its inconclusive finding on saliva, the DNA had been sent to the FBI lab in Quantico, Virginia, which had a nine-month backlog."
I would just like to see some of the original investigators just open their hearts and work on Riley's case. It just seems that her actual case has hit the backburner and the focus has become on this civil suit. Finding Riley's killer should be eveyone's priority and I am saddened that we hear about the wrongful confession of Kevins over and over again associated with $$$ and a lawsuit. Justice for Riley. Don't care if the Foxes ever get a dime..Find Riley's killer whomever that may be..
Also, it would seem there were more "amended" complaints, it seems some supervisors were added. When ever there is/was something like this, there was some sort of press coverage, I can't seem to find anything past this "second amended complaint". Maybe it was because there was nothing new other than adding names.
I don't have much time today guys, but Ijust wanted to say I agree. Too much time/energy wasted on this civil suit. Just a quick thought on the couple of posts here.
Crash, when I first posted here a while back, I think the detectives were involved in another homicide somwhere in the same vicinity, the guy was claiming the same thing..coerced confession. I was comenting back then as to their "character" but to clairify, I also meant their "record". Have they done murder investigations before, waht was teir reputation in town at court etc...
Also, it would seem there were more "amended" complaints, it seems some supervisors were added. When ever there is/was something like this, there was some sort of press coverage, I can't seem to find anything past this "second amended complaint". Maybe it was because there was nothing new other than adding names.
One last thought before I go, Crash, not to put words in your mouth but you said "I would just like to see some of the original investigators just open their hearts and work on Riley's case." In the Chicago article it said they were all "reassigned". Are they still investigators, on like "desk duty" or something, or have they been sent to different duties? Your post seems to indicate maybe you think these guys should be back on the case, looking for the killer, do you have that much trust in them or do you think they are the best shot because they know the most about the case?
Lisa, if you're reading this you should check out the Chicago SOS.