D
Deleted member 158085
Guest
This part, him telling a woman about this, is so bizarre. I sure wish we could know how he knew her and why he felt comfortable telling her all of this.okay recapping theories
-he picked her up Presumably he had planned on incapacitating her very quickly.. but not permanently or too seriously, still assuming he wanted her alive for his plan and not dead.
He could possibly have attained this interim goal with a physical blow with an object, a hypodermic syringe, a choke-hold of some description, a gag, ropes etc.. many other theories have been discussed here as well.
Her phone was never recovered, nor was her backpack.
Its likely he immobilised her phone pretty quickly as the apartment owner was texting her when she failed to appear. We do not know whether the text or texts were received by her phone, only that they were sent.
This may provide a time window.. if they were never received he had to have destroyed or immobilised phone within an extremely short timeframe.. less than 30 minutes.
- So he has her in car or out of car, she is unconscious or just immobilised and silenced.. he needs to bring her somewhere for his plan..
Its still daylight. Summer. Early afternoon.
Even if blindsided with excitement at his occupation, he still did not forget to destroy her phone and her backpack.
part of his mind was working efficiently..these items were never recovered.
-He was broke..he needed money and had no desire to earn it legally..
He had a hostage.. what was she worth?
Was she worth more dead than alive?
Was his plan solely to use her for his own warped pleasure or did he also have a financial motive?
If we cannot locate his contacts we have no way to find this out..
The tape allegedly made reference to a struggle..
I dont know how much of the tape was him simply trying to impress the woman he escorted on the march and how much was the truth..
Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk