bolding mine
Good points to ponder.
Sorry I just have to say this : I hope there were no unasked questions that should have been ... asked !!
It's just that five years seemed much too long for the grieving families to have to wait; depending if there was video or audio of the perp on the girl's phones that could've assisted in identifying the perp.
At the very beginning, I thought it was said that there was more audio of the crime itself , but it couldn't be released as it was too graphic ?
But not for the investigators, they must have listened to everything repeatedly.
Outside of the bridge clip, Idk if there was more video.
This may sound unrealistic -- but if RA spoke to the investigators, could they have recorded something he said, and replayed it, and see if it matched what might have been on one of the girl's phones ?
A voice comparison ?
And since he lived in the general area, talked to RA again about his alibi and have him show where he walked that day ?
OR, could they have had dogs scent something of his and see if the dogs went to the crime scene following his scent ?
I realize this is after the fact.
M00.