I've read several times recently that this investigation is still open. If they have their suspect, I wonder what they are still investigating.
Everything imaginable, I’d guess.
I've read several times recently that this investigation is still open. If they have their suspect, I wonder what they are still investigating.
I wouldn’t be surprised if LE arrested him to keep him away from the public due to his possible connection to other detrimental crimes, that we know nothing about.Carter says "this investigation is far from complete..."
So LE continues to investigate the murders of Abby and Libby. I wonder what "far from complete" means. Probably there is a lot they are investigating yet. I wonder if that includes people.
That statement alone could lead me to think there is so much unknown, not just to the public, but to LE themselves.
Could be their current suspect has tentacles.
I wouldn't be surprised if another arrest came along, other players involved, or possibly other murders tied to RA.
![]()
Delphi suspect charged with 2 counts of murder; ‘Investigation far from complete’
DELPHI, Ind. — It’s a development loved ones of Libby German and Abby Williams have long prayed for: charges filed in connection to the Delphi murder investigation. Indiana State Police annou…www.8newsnow.com
I assume that RA will have been assigned a public defender before the hearing on November 22nd on whether or not the PCA will remain sealed or not?
Contingent, of course, on whether the court reviews his finances and determines he is eligible for a public defender.
EBM typo
RA initially told the court that he would be hiring a private attorney, but then later on he changed his mind and submitted a letter to the court asking that he be assigned a public defender because he didn't realize how expensive it would be to hire a private attorney. It still hasn't been reported if the court has approved his request based on his finances, but if he is eligible for a PD, then hope he has one by November 22 with time for the attorney to prepare for the hearing, otherwise I wonder if assigned attorney will request an extension for the hearing to give her/him time to prepare.Yes. He probably had a PD right off the bat, then it's his choice re: public vs. private, plus he can choose to change counsel. That is his Constitutional right.
"These are things the public has a right to know." Carroll County Prosecutor Nicholas McLeland said in a press conference Monday that he asked a judge to seal the charging information and the probable cause affidavit, both are court documents laying out evidence the state has gathered when they charge a person with a crime.
So far no one knows what evidence there is against RA. At the press conference all that was said were emotions and religious beliefs, nothing about the evidence. A judge issued the warrant so you can be confident the probable cause held up to scrutiny. But if it is kept under seal, that is a temporary measure and an exception based on some compelling reason, perhaps to do with the ongoing investigation. They apparently still need enough evidence to convict him which is a much higher bar than just indicting him."I was prosecutor for 10 years in Gary. I charged probably 1,000 people with murder," Crawford said. "Never once did we prohibit the public from looking at the probable cause affidavit if they were in custody."
RA initially told the court that he would be hiring a private attorney, but then later on he changed his mind and submitted a letter to the court asking that he be assigned a public defender because he didn't realize how expensive it would be to hire a private attorney. It still hasn't been reported if the court has approved his request based on his finances, but if he is eligible for a PD, then hope he has one by November 22 with time for the attorney to prepare for the hearing, otherwise I wonder if assigned attorney will request an extension for the hearing to give her/him time to prepare.
What is the difference in the present case and the lengthy lock on the Barry Morphew charging document? Sorry don't recall the technical name, but imo there were all sorts of shenanigans used as the reason to withhold that for what, at least a month? More? Ie sensitivity of the document to certain young women, iirc.To clarify, the hearing is to determine whether to release the seal on the charging document and the probable cause affidavit. It's between the judge and the prosecutors. RA might not even be represented. It is not RA's choice or the lawyer's choice. It isn't a question of privacy or tainting potential jurors or sensitivity to the loved ones or even safety. As a principle, the US does not throw people in jail based on secret evidence.
From:
Delphi Murders: Why are court records sealed for Richard M. Allen, the man charged in Abby & Libby's death?
So far no one knows what evidence there is against RA. At the press conference all that was said were emotions and religious beliefs, nothing about the evidence. A judge issued the warrant so you can be confident the probable cause held up to scrutiny. But if it is kept under seal, that is a temporary measure and an exception based on some compelling reason, perhaps to do with the ongoing investigation. They apparently still need enough evidence to convict him which is a much higher bar than just indicting him.
In addition to the original Motion from the Prosecutor to seal the Probable Cause AffidavitTo clarify, the hearing is to determine whether to release the seal on the charging document and the probable cause affidavit. It's between the judge and the prosecutors. RA might not even be represented. It is not RA's choice or the lawyer's choice. It isn't a question of privacy or tainting potential jurors or sensitivity to the loved ones or even safety. As a principle, the US does not throw people in jail based on secret evidence.
From:
Delphi Murders: Why are court records sealed for Richard M. Allen, the man charged in Abby & Libby's death?
So far no one knows what evidence there is against RA. At the press conference all that was said were emotions and religious beliefs, nothing about the evidence. A judge issued the warrant so you can be confident the probable cause held up to scrutiny. But if it is kept under seal, that is a temporary measure and an exception based on some compelling reason, perhaps to do with the ongoing investigation. They apparently still need enough evidence to convict him which is a much higher bar than just indicting him.
Would RA be present in court for this hearing?Lauded Judge and Former Prosecutor Is Set to Oversee the Delphi Murders Trial – Here's What to Know
The next hearing in the Delphi murders case is currently slated for Nov. 22, 2022. That hearing is formally scheduled to address a number of sealed evidentiary documents in the tightly-guarded case. Local law enforcement have been particularly secretive about numerous details thus far – even the defendant’s current location, as well as the probable cause for his arrest and charges, are currently a mystery.
Gull told the Gazette she also intends to deal with a recent request from Allen for the court to appoint him a public defender.
“I think there’s no sense in scheduling another hearing,” the judge said.
ETA:text added
SBMBUT, what do we have officially that says this wasn't a crime of opportunity?
Point being -- there is nothing out there that suggested RA had any electronic communications with either of the victims
Judging from the pre trial hearings I’ve followed in the Kaitlin Armstrong case, he well could be. She mainly was present at her hearings although there was an absence or two. I have nothing else to judge it by.Would RA be present in court for this hearing?
I just assumed he would be present if she is appointing a public defender but I don’t really know.Would RA be present in court for this hearing?
Depends on if we're still playing Where's Richard?Would RA be present in court for this hearing?
Was there an initial public arraignment of him?I just assumed he would be present if she is appointing a public defender but I don’t really know.
To my knowledge nothing public so far, he had a closed hearing on the 28th of Oct where he pled not guilty to the two charges. (that was stated from the prosecutor 31st Oct during the presser)Was there an initial public arraignment of him?