I think the charging documents are the 2 documents that list the charges, page 3&4 in attachment.Wait is the "Charging Document" different from the PCA? And has it been released?
I think the charging documents are the 2 documents that list the charges, page 3&4 in attachment.Wait is the "Charging Document" different from the PCA? And has it been released?
Light blue jacket - dark blue jacket or even black (RA himself didn't know, it seems) - all black clothes. That's not understandable to me, these differences.Man in black just seems to be the same guy - it's just one witness remembered his clothes differently.
Just a guess, alphabetically. Even this thread has always been “Abby & Libby”I asked this in the last thread but never got an answer so reposting here as I'd really like one if one of you have the answer.
I was wondering how they come up with numbering victims. Maybe the one closest to where they are is #1? Can anyone explain this, please? TIA!!
Would love to know what he did with the muddy/bloody clothes. He was dumb enough to keep the weapon, I bet the clothes were just washed and put away in the closet.
I stand corrected, my bad!The actual document titled Probable Cause Affidavit has numbering in lower left-hand corner that reads 1 of 8, 2 of 8, etc. The numbered pages stop at 7 of 8.
Years ago DC said, the public would wonder and be very surprised about the immense stuff, police had collected and investigated (other wording). I don't notice it yet.Well there we have it. A whole lot of what we have seen over the past several years strongly hinted at incompetence from law enforcement, but reading this document there is very little doubt now.
And yes, the only logical reason I can see for sealing the document was self preservation and the opportunity to have their triumphant press conference without having to face the blindingly obvious question of how it took them so long to reach this point. Amateur hour.
Would love to know what he victims' families are thinking of their law enforcement right now.
It’s called the fog of war (an enormous case). Things that look so easy to you from the comfort of your couch are not so simple with twenty phones ringing, not enough help to handle the cascade of leads, and meetings every two hours.
I wonder how they came up with kidnapping and not simply a sexual act (since their clothes were off). How in the world would someone (RMA) think that he could simply walk the girls out of there after (likely) sexually assaulting them DTH? He had to know the chances of them being seen would be huge since he ran into others earlier. I can't wrap my head around that.
View attachment 383587
View attachment 383588
![]()
Judge issues gag order following release of redacted court docs in arrest of Richard Allen for Delphi murders
The documents detail what led to a murder charge against Richard Allen in the killings of Libby German and Abby Williams.www.wthr.com
But…..at no point did LE acknowledge that they’ve identified the man in the video or have spoken to him. They continued to ask for the public’s help in identifying who the man was. So that tells me he likely did not tell his wife “hey that’s me in the video.”Now that we know what we know, I have to wonder if his wife did and asked him “is that you in the video?” he could have said “yes, I told the police I was there on the bridge that day”. Why would she question it? He did tell the police he was there that day wearing that outfit.
Thank you! Though something is still missing. Page 8.
The actual document titled Probable Cause Affidavit has numbering in lower left-hand corner that reads 1 of 8, 2 of 8, etc. The numbered pages stop at 7 of 8.
Oh, I see. I was thinking of kidnapping like taking them somewhere. Well, he did take them somewhere (DTH) but I meant somewhere else. So simply forcing them DTH by showing a gun is considered kidnapping then. I guess.I guess because they have kidnapping on video, it makes the intent component an easy layup.
The gun + command, and then physical evidence of the killings, give them the whole deal.
Just the identity question.
I know. I’m really confused about how/why she didn’t recognize him. I was just trying to come up with a theory. I guess we don’t know that she knew in 2017 that he’d told police he was on the bridge. So maybe he lied to his wife about where he was that day but told the police the truth.But…..at no point did LE acknowledge that they’ve identified the man in the video or have spoken to him. They continued to ask for the public’s help in identifying who the man was. So that tells me he likely did not tell his wife “hey that’s me in the video.”
I don't really know. Maybe she did know but washed the clothing and just decided to believe him even after he admitted to being on the bridge.How do you know they didn’t?
Answering myself...Oh, I see. I was thinking of kidnapping like taking them somewhere. Well, he did take them somewhere (DTH) but I meant somewhere else. So simply forcing them DTH by showing a gun is considered kidnapping then. I guess.![]()