Found Deceased IN - Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen Arrested - #162

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
girlhasnoname said:
Thanks for the question. I believe most people (myself included) want to know why. It's human nature, especially in a murder so heinous. How could this happen?

In my mind RA is bridge guy no doubt. I think he went there solely that day with the intentions to kill those girls and by a stroke of our misfortune, was overlooked as a suspect early on.

I believe he was quite pleased with himself as time wore on and wasn't arrested. Enough that I think he may have gone on to eventually commit another murder in the future.

JMO
Click to expand...
I only would want to make sure that RA is bridge guy with more evidence and maybe that information will be released in the future. Maybe the defense has already received new evidence that makes them question the innocence of Richard Allen?

When people cannot figure something out, I think they come to the conclusion that the "why" does not matter.
 
The arrest of RA came out of the blue. Since he wasn't on anyone's radar, that is enough for a lot of folks to think LE must have it wrong, and that they rushed to arrest. RI said long ago that when they caught the guy, LE had the evidence they needed for a conviction. I guess we'll see. Up to this point, though, the public has been far more eager and willing to string up innocent people in this case than LE has.

As of November 2022, NMcL stood before the court and said that they believe RA was the man on the bridge, and that they have good reason to believe he was not the only actor in the murders. I don't want to see an innocent man go to prison for a crime he didn't commit, of course, but we have absolutely no idea what evidence LE and the prosecution has for them to make those claims (other than the PCA), so I'm not personally comfortable dismissing the claims based on my own beliefs. What other evidence they have on RA, or if they still believe others are involved, only time will tell.
 
somequestions said:
I only would want to make sure that RA is bridge guy with more evidence and maybe that information will be released in the future. Maybe the defense has already received new evidence that makes them question the innocence of Richard Allen?

When people cannot figure something out, I think they come to the conclusion that the "why" does not matter.
Click to expand...

It’s the trial which will prove RA guilty or not guilty. I doubt the evidence will be released to the general public in advance of that. All of us on the outside don’t always agree with the final court verdict and that’s okay, it’s just an opinion important to remember that of jurors counts more than ours. It’s what the justice system was built upon.

JMO
 
Prosecutor wants assurances Allen's attorneys won't publish sensitive evidence

McLeland filed the motion for a court order on Monday, requesting, "That the discovery material shall not be publicly exhibited, displayed, shown or used for educational, research or demonstrative purposes or used in any other manner, except in judicial proceedings in the above referenced action."

The prosecutor's motion also asks that the court limit the viewing and copying of the evidence to only Allen, his attorneys or the defense's expert witnesses or investigators. The evidence is not to be shown to any person who is not supposed to view it, including witnesses, Allen's family members, relatives or friends, according to the motion.
 
Last edited:
Update:
02/13/202Motion to Intervene Filed
Media Intervenors' Renewed Motion to Intervene and Motion to Grant Public Access to the State's Verified Request to Prohibit Public Access
Filed By: INDIANA BROADCASTERS ASSOCIATION
Filed By: HOOSIER STATE PRESS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Filed By: THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed By: CIRCLE CITY BROADCASTING I, LLC
Filed By: E.W. SCRIPPS COMPANY
Filed By: NEXSTAR MEDIA INC.
Filed By: TEGNA INC.
Filed By: GANNETT SATELLITE INFORMATION INDIANA NEWSPAPERS, LLC
Filed By: AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INC.
Filed By: NEUHOFF MEDIA LAFAYETTE, LLC
Filed By: WOOF BOOM RADIO LLC
File Stamp: 02/10/2023
02/13/2023Response Filed
State's Response
Filed By: State of Indiana
02/13/2023Motion Filed
Motion
Filed By: State of Indiana
02/17/2023Hearing
Session: 02/17/2023 10:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ
03/20/2023Jury Trial
Session: 03/20/2023 9:00 AM, Rescheduled
Session: 03/21/2023 9:00 AM, Cancelled
Session: 03/22/2023 9:00 AM, Cancelled
Session: 03/23/2023 9:00 AM, Cancelled
Session: 03/24/2023 9:00 AM, Cancelled
Session: 03/20/2023 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ
Session: 03/21/2023 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ
Session: 03/22/2023 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ
Session: 03/23/2023 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ
Session: 03/24/2023 9:00 AM, Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances -SJ
Comment: First Setting
 
MistyWaters said:
It’s the trial which will prove RA guilty or not guilty. I doubt the evidence will be released to the general public in advance of that. All of us on the outside don’t always agree with the final court verdict and that’s okay, it’s just an opinion important to remember that of jurors counts more than ours. It’s what the justice system was built upon.

JMO
Click to expand...
I know there is a gag order in this case. I never thought the evidence would be released to the public before the trial. I doubt all the evidence will be released to the public even when there is a verdict, without some type of legal request.

I only hoped that the probable cause would have been stronger to substantiate the arrest so that the speculation would go away. When I found out an arrest was made, I thought the case was over because of all the evidence former prosecutor Ives said the murderer left at the crime scene. Now I sometimes wonder if law enforcement arrested the right person.
 
id like to reverse what is being said here
the fact that this suspect was caught without any prior signs and that he was completely under the radar ..and was caught in the middle of the KAK circus
point to him as BG ..we always said BG wasnt the big bad wolf with many red herrings attached that everyone was looking for.
 
somequestions said:
I know there is a gag order in this case. I never thought the evidence would be released to the public before the trial. I doubt all the evidence will be released to the public even when there is a verdict, without some type of legal request.

I only hoped that the probable cause would have been stronger to substantiate the arrest so that the speculation would go away. When I found out an arrest was made, I thought the case was over because of all the evidence former prosecutor Ives said the murderer left at the crime scene. Now I sometimes wonder if law enforcement arrested the right person.
Click to expand...
My worry is that they do have the right person in custody, but that the public demand for evidence in advance of the trial will compromise the case.
 
steeltowngirl said:
My worry is that they do have the right person in custody, but that the public demand for evidence in advance of the trial will compromise the case.
Click to expand...
Imo, the public can demand all it wants, but the court won't fold to that demand. The prosecution is taking steps to prevent too much information from coming out, and I think the judge will order accordingly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 87 more.
Total: 273 (members: 88, guests: 185)

Online statistics

Members online
88
Guests online
186
Total visitors
274
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
608,823
Messages
18,246,060
Members
234,459
Latest member
mclureprestige
Back
Top