Miya,
I am sorry I don’t have the memorandum to reference in this response. I am on my phone and it is downloaded elsewhere. My understanding of events is that in defense memorandum states two separate things. 1) Liggett stated during deposition on August 8th that a Purdue Professor did not believe the sticks left at the crime scene were Odinist symbols. 2) Defense states that September 6th Prosecutor NMCL was unable to identify who the Purdue Professor was.
Now once the memorandum came out, State Trooper did find and re-interview the Purdue Professor on September 19th, and then provide the interview to defense on September 27th on a hard drive.
The initial interview of the Purdue Professor was also done by Holeman in the months after the murders and the conclusion at that time was it was not related to Odinist or any other cult worship.
New interview basically states several things but mostly that the patterns look like “somebody” trying to replicate runes.
Holeman, Liggett and NMCL are all different people with different roles.
If they wanted to HIDE the Professor’s testimony then they did a horrible job by tracking him down and getting a new interview.
Of course they were hiding him, the even claimed it would be impossible to find him and nobody has any idea who he is. In the new filing today defense says they got an email on September 6 from the prosecutor who said that they still haven't found him even with contacting the FBI and the university and that they may not be able to identify him. September 18 defense files the memo and just a few days later they "find" the Professor and Holeman interviews him? No doubt they were trying to hide him but had to do something once they knew the defense knew about him and is starting to ask questions.
I don't know if RA did it or was involved, what I do know though is that the weird memo, that most people ridicule, is starting to make more and more sense. The defense is poking at things, making them public, because they know something is rotten in Denmark. The investigators made a lot of mistakes and still do and it's horrible because either they have the wrong man, or have the right one but there are more that are still (and maybe forever) free or somebody else did it.
If the investigation wasn't so full of problems, we wouldn't have that memo, we wouldn't have what I'm sure the defense can and will use in court for reasonable doubt and we would be sure that they have the right guy. It's tragic.