Defense is trying to act like RA’s height is somehow a barrier to committing crime.
The Franks memo’s dramatic recitation, absolutely astonished at the thought that a grown man in the prime of life with no known physical restrictions would be able to forge across a shallow stream, point out RA’s height:
3. At some point in time this single, solitary man would have had to cross a cold river whose depth was nearly 3.5 feet. At this depth, if the water were only two feet higher, Richard’s whole body would have been completely immersed, from head to toe
https://www.scribd.com/document/672126677/DELPHI-Memorandum-in-Support-of-Motion-pdf
They go on to theatrically have minds blown at the notion that a shallow a stream with cold water is within this short person’s ability to corral two young, naïve girls at gunpoint and cross a stream where their clothes would get “drenched”!
Deer Creek is a stream, not a river as floridly emphasized. It’s a tributary of the Wabash River.
Geographic Names Information System
IMO, D’s are going to have to come up with proof that RA has severe physical limitations and is not competent in the least since that seems to be their idea is that he is too stunted to function and doesn’t have enough dexterity to even put an arm in a sleeve which on the surface and by all appearances seems completely untrue.
all imo