MJPeony
SF Bay Area
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2014
- Messages
- 1,744
- Reaction score
- 10,664
From following previous cases I have learned that prosecutors are heavily involved during investigations advising LE. When an arrest is made, the clock starts ticking toward a speedy trial. Now, we know it is more than likely, there will not be a speedy trial. However, if an arrested person demanded a speedy trial, there would be one. There will only be one trial. An arrest will not be made until prosecutors believe there is enough evidence for a conviction. LE gathers the evidence. Prosecutor presents that evidence in court.
Yes, but if there is enough evidence for LE to know who their BG is, it seems there would be enough to make good headway towards a strong court case.
Arrests have been made with circumstantial evidence before (several mentioned in earlier thread pages), and not only when there is a “slam dunk”. Anyway, something has never added up to me regarding the concept that LE hasn’t arrested anyone just bc it’s not a slam dunk.
Topic has been hashed out several times so apologies to bring up again. I just remain baffled as to why they don’t have enough to make an arrest if (IF) they have enough to know for sure who he is. I’m not sure I’ll get a reason that will make sense in my head.