sunshineray
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2019
- Messages
- 9,324
- Reaction score
- 75,460
A white Toyota? Or a machete?I've posted this before, at 4:08 into this forum listen to what she possibly "slips up" at saying:
A white Toyota? Or a machete?I've posted this before, at 4:08 into this forum listen to what she possibly "slips up" at saying:
We don’t know if he is a Christian and pondering eternity. A true believer would probably not kill two teenagers to start with. So Carter is wrong in assuming, the Shack... this guy is probably not a Christian, inside, or if he is, he created a complex system of “earning redemption and forgiveness” that does not include prison.
I think he is not religious, but it is irrelevant.
More interesting is why he killed them. The situation might be more complicated than SA. I think such people kill out of perceived feeling of a threat.
I would never have imagined on day one we would go through 115 threads and have no arrest. However Monster’s “luck” is going to run out one day.
Thank you to all of you for keeping the thread going and for not giving up on justice for Abigail and Liberty and their families.
Imho so far we can conclude, and some of this is my “sleuthing” thus speculative, so please bear with me, but I’m desperate to figure this one out. He is a white male between 17 and 60 who either lives near the rail, used to live in a home growing up near the rail, or has an immediate family member now who lives near the rail. He is interested in *advertiser censored*, and has a sexual perversion for young girls, possibly ( not definite, but likely) because he was abused by his father who has a perversion, or another adult, when he was a youth. He has access to a gun and knowledge of guns, probably. He does not have a solid alibi for that afternoon. He does resemble the video , and his voice obviously matches the audio, and if they have dna, he is a match, so his local family would also be a match. He has no remorse and has not told anyone. He is not suspected by his friends and family, although he has some weird cracks in his normal mask that people just dismiss. The town’s people know him, he is a local, though he may not live there now, but for some reason, not political, more like an error, he was given a pass.Again, speculation.
Sheila, I think you are right that BG was probably for sure abused as a child, likely in a pretty brutal way and by someone a child should be able to trust. Somewhere the wiring went wrong for kid BG and here we are. JMO
Maybe because he was abused as a child he feels the incident at the bridge is just a snapshot of his character and it's not who he really is. He feels misunderstood and he doesn't understand or know what made him do what he did.
Maybe because he was abused as a child he feels the incident at the bridge is just a snapshot of his character and it's not who he really is. He feels misunderstood and he doesn't understand or know what made him do what he did.
So psyched people found the possibility of the offender being a Redditor to be realistic! I picture the offender on Reddit more than Websleuths because of his age, mostly. I don't currently have a specific Reddit user in mind as a throwaway being used by the offender, but I've looked. Of particular interest in my "offender Redditor profile" is someone who comments on sports threads, then occasionally switches to r/delphimurders. A "dude" who switches it up like that would also be able to compartmentalize in a similar way, don't you think?
A sports fan with a morbid streak.
I don't believe ISP Carter was saying a combination of the two sketches. I think he was saying a combination of the photographic image and the new sketch. LE has said the NBG sketch is the face of Libby and Abby's killer and to disregard the first released BG sketch. IIRCI can't let go of Carter saying BG will probably be a combination of the two sketches. That, to me, is one of the most telling statements made so far. In other words, focus on the video and audio. If you recognize the man in either, than don't put too much stock into the sketches. Sketches are really only a tool, IMO.
When I was little, I tried to describe a dog to my mom to find out what breed it was. She asked me to draw her a picture. It was no more than a cartoon, I'm sure, but it was enough to help her brain make a match when added to the other information I'd told her.
I suppose anything is possible but it just doesn't fit the PC IMO. I don't envision a mentally ill paranoid schizophrenic uttering the command, "Guys......down the hill," with such calm and confidence. But, that's just me.There is a good point there in saying it is possible that BG might of been a very sick mentally ill person who was walking the trail that day and chanting and talking to himself while in a very paranoid delusional state of mind. When he saw the two girls, he might of perceived them as possibly mocking him in some way, or maybe had hallucinations of them being some sort of threat.
I suppose anything is possible but it just doesn't fit the PC IMO. I don't envision a mentally ill paranoid schizophrenic uttering the command, "Guys......down the hill," with such calm and confidence. But, that's just me.
At around the 4:10 mark, Carter says he thinks the suspect will "probably look something similar to both of the two sketches that we've released."I don't believe ISP Carter was saying a combination of the two sketches. I think he was saying a combination of the photographic image and the new sketch. LE has said the NBG sketch is the face of Libby and Abby's killer and to disregard the first released BG sketch. IIRC
I agree: "The situation might be more complicated than SA." Don't ask me, why I'm thinking that since the beginning (though with interruptions dependent on the POI).More interesting is why he killed them. The situation might be more complicated than SA. I think such people kill out of perceived feeling of a threat.
To be honest, you might find me on a sports message board then the Delphi Reddit over the same lunch in a given day, but that's only because I like sports and have been fascinated with this case since day 1, so that might make too many innocent people suspects in your eyes. I actually got a kick out of your post because that described me. I just like to peruse various things I am interested in. I am no murderer, for sure, though!
And I for one will never understand that statement as those two sketches couldn't be more different. Then, throw in the image/face (we can't see) from BG and I'm at a total loss as to what BG actually looks like. I've seen pics of people that look like NBG, pics of people that look like OBG and pics of people that have a vague resemblance to BG Just colour me confused at this point. Oh, and one voice that resembles BG but I don't think it's him anymoreAt around the 4:10 mark, Carter says he thinks the suspect will "probably look something similar to both of the two sketches that we've released."
Imho so far we can conclude, and some of this is my “sleuthing” thus speculative, so please bear with me, but I’m desperate to figure this one out. He is a white male between 17 and 60 who either lives near the rail, used to live in a home growing up near the rail, or has an immediate family member now who lives near the rail. He is interested in *advertiser censored*, and has a sexual perversion for young girls, possibly ( not definite, but likely) because he was abused by his father who has a perversion, or another adult, when he was a youth. He has access to a gun and knowledge of guns, probably. He does not have a solid alibi for that afternoon. He does resemble the video , and his voice obviously matches the audio, and if they have dna, he is a match, so his local family would also be a match. He has no remorse and has not told anyone. He is not suspected by his friends and family, although he has some weird cracks in his normal mask that people just dismiss. The town’s people know him, he is a local, though he may not live there now, but for some reason, not political, more like an error, he was given a pass. if they have dna, it would help if the houses near the rail gave dna voluntarily. Again, speculation.