It is likely that the quality of the sample from the CS was holding them back.How long does it take for LE to confirm a DNA match?
Days? Weeks? Months?
But with person to look at, the matching markers become more meaningful.
It is likely that the quality of the sample from the CS was holding them back.How long does it take for LE to confirm a DNA match?
Days? Weeks? Months?
Forgive my ignorance, but IF sexual assault was involved in the murder of Abby and Libby then wouldn’t they have a significant amount of dna? I tend to believe that the murder of Abby and Libby did not include sexual assault because of Carter’s remarks about there being no “why”. IMO if it was a sexual assault and murder, the “why” is pretty obvious. Plus I don’t think they have significant DNA. Just Moo but this is why I’m leaning towards JBC NOT being BG because his motive is obviously sexual whereas IMO Abby and Libby’s murder was not.
thoughts?
unless the girls were found in water/partially in water where dna from a sexual assault would be compromised?
BINGO!! This has been on my mind since they released information about JBC living under a bridge for several days.It seems Chadwell was homeless at times, so I wonder where he was living and whether he was in or out of prison at the time of this April 26, 2014 incident at RL's property.
April 26, 9:49 p.m. – Burglary, 5858W. 300N., Delphi. Ron Logan reported finding a person in his barn who was not authorized to be there. The unidentified person fled the barn prior to police arrival. The suspect was not located. Liggett investigated.
I made a map that combines the topography of the area with a satellite image to give you a sense of where they were found. Cardinal directions are what you would expect, the top is North. The 'body site' isn't precisely known so I included a box that's just my opinion of where they were found.
Forgive my ignorance, but IF sexual assault was involved in the murder of Abby and Libby then wouldn’t they have a significant amount of dna? I tend to believe that the murder of Abby and Libby did not include sexual assault because of Carter’s remarks about there being no “why”. IMO if it was a sexual assault and murder, the “why” is pretty obvious. Plus I don’t think they have significant DNA. Just Moo but this is why I’m leaning towards JBC NOT being BG because his motive is obviously sexual whereas IMO Abby and Libby’s murder was not.
thoughts?
unless the girls were found in water/partially in water where dna from a sexual assault would be compromised?
Sexually motivated does not have to include invasive or penetrative sexual assault.Forgive my ignorance, but IF sexual assault was involved in the murder of Abby and Libby then wouldn’t they have a significant amount of dna? I tend to believe that the murder of Abby and Libby did not include sexual assault because of Carter’s remarks about there being no “why”. IMO if it was a sexual assault and murder, the “why” is pretty obvious. Plus I don’t think they have significant DNA. Just Moo but this is why I’m leaning towards JBC NOT being BG because his motive is obviously sexual whereas IMO Abby and Libby’s murder was not.
thoughts?
unless the girls were found in water/partially in water where dna from a sexual assault would be compromised?
ITA. It has been my thought from the beginning that there was no sexual assault. And I can only think of two logical reason as to why. And that would that he could not get physically aroused, which may be the reason as to why they were brutally murdered. Or because he (or she) knew them in some way that the thought of sexually assaulting the girls was repulsive to him (or her). And/or BG is a female, although the likelihood is extremely low, but not out of the question.Forgive my ignorance, but IF sexual assault was involved in the murder of Abby and Libby then wouldn’t they have a significant amount of dna? I tend to believe that the murder of Abby and Libby did not include sexual assault because of Carter’s remarks about there being no “why”. IMO if it was a sexual assault and murder, the “why” is pretty obvious. Plus I don’t think they have significant DNA. Just Moo but this is why I’m leaning towards JBC NOT being BG because his motive is obviously sexual whereas IMO Abby and Libby’s murder was not.
thoughts?
unless the girls were found in water/partially in water where dna from a sexual assault would be compromised?
Let me rephrase it a bit..Sexually motivated does not have to include invasive or penetrative sexual assault.
No, a small nine year old is different than a strong and brave Libby who was willing to fight.Let me rephrase it a bit..
JBC in his offense against the 9 year old was absolutely violent and invasive. What I’m saying is... if JBC is BG would we not expect similar mode of assault. And if BG did similar to what happened with the 9 year old, wouldn’t obvious DNA be there? And wouldn’t motive be obvious?
this is why I question is JBC the BG? To me, seems motives and modes in each case are different. DOESNT mean it’s not him, just up for discussion.
Forgive my ignorance, but IF sexual assault was involved in the murder of Abby and Libby then wouldn’t they have a significant amount of dna? I tend to believe that the murder of Abby and Libby did not include sexual assault because of Carter’s remarks about there being no “why”. IMO if it was a sexual assault and murder, the “why” is pretty obvious. Plus I don’t think they have significant DNA. Just Moo but this is why I’m leaning towards JBC NOT being BG because his motive is obviously sexual whereas IMO Abby and Libby’s murder was not.
thoughts?
unless the girls were found in water/partially in water where dna from a sexual assault would be compromised?
Let me rephrase it a bit..
JBC in his offense against the 9 year old was absolutely violent and invasive. What I’m saying is... if JBC is BG would we not expect similar mode of assault. And if BG did similar to what happened with the 9 year old, wouldn’t obvious DNA be there? And wouldn’t motive be obvious?
this is why I question is JBC the BG? To me, seems motives and modes in each case are different. DOESNT mean it’s not him, just up for discussion.
If anyone could answer this.If they didn't release the manner of murder (maybe) because the perpetrator would murder someone else differently, then why did they release the sketch? (That just makes me think the sketch is incorrect)
If they know the manner of murder then why haven't they looked into other cases where the manner of murder is similar, if not the exact same?
Police have said they have 'additional evidence', but they didn't release it (I'm not sure if they released it already) because they didn't want to "compromise any future trial". What does this "compromise any future trial" mean?
This is JMO.