FrostedGlass
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2017
- Messages
- 5,967
- Reaction score
- 29,105
I don't completely understand filings in the court site so I'm puzzled why someone found it necessary to pull the KAK case completely offline. Couldn't they have just kept the case online and then added the motions later that day like they did? Seems like that would have been the better way to do it to avoid attention to the motions.
It's almost like they wanted to create curiosity. (tinfoil hat on)
Do the news reporters have deeper access to the court site or do they only see the public filings like we do?
It's almost like they wanted to create curiosity. (tinfoil hat on)
Do the news reporters have deeper access to the court site or do they only see the public filings like we do?