Nope. We’re still in the dark there, as we are with most of the details of this case.I know the COD was not released, but did they release any possible time of death?
let's go back to the sketch article for a min and chew on this part:
The sketch released on Monday was drawn by Bryant on Feb. 17, 2017, a few days after the victims' bodies were found. The picture was based on the description of a person who saw something that the person felt needed to be reported, according to Bryant.
Delphi murders: New sketch of killer, video from Libby's phone released
Does that seem like it means it was not necessarily someone seen at the bridge or that area? But someone saw the sketch person doing something odd somewhere else or seemed out of place or something?
Maybe this is why they didn't take the sketch very seriously at first. I dunno, just thinking out loud but it seems an unusual statement imo
I also wonder if LE is kinda upset that the sketch artist spilled the beans about the sketch being old lol
"Also, I don't think it's fair to call the search site abandoned. Everyone involved was out well past dark, and in wooded areas far from light and near a river, I am quite certain the decision to call off the search for the night was made for safety reasons."
Get some flashlights. I would have. I can't imagine their thinking. Which was, as published, they believed the girls were missing by choice. And they stopped searching because it was......dark. Yes, it's dark at night. But that's what flashlights are for. If it were my child, I would have sued for abandoning the search. They would have settled too.
Would the family leaving the press conference upset and in tears have caused the LE Officer to be shaken and emotional?
And WHO exactly called off the search that night? I know it was dark but that always struck me as odd. Two kids missing - let's wait til morning?
Maybe the car is where the witness saw the killer and they don't want tosaythe car type because the killer might try to get ridof the car....andif the police mentioned the car type...he wouldn't be able to get rid of the car without someone being suspicious.I'm a bit confused re. the car part of things. A car had been parked by the old building. Is this the same car that LE referred to being abandoned by the side of the road and if so, what was the timeline for that.
I think the first picture had everyone looking for an older guy. That was misleading to most people. The new picture shows a younger looking guy. Perhaps we should have been looking in plain sight for a middle aged baby faced dude. Maybe one who was clean shaven prior to the crime and not so much after. MooI don’t know if this has been brought up yet but IMO, it is strange that this new sketch looks like such a young man. Maybe he is older than he looks but people do not usually jump from committing no crime to committing a “brutal” double homicide. Where has this guy come from?
"Also, I don't think it's fair to call the search site abandoned. Everyone involved was out well past dark, and in wooded areas far from light and near a river, I am quite certain the decision to call off the search for the night was made for safety reasons."
Get some flashlights. I would have. I can't imagine their thinking. Which was, as published, they believed the girls were missing by choice. And they stopped searching because it was......dark. Yes, it's dark at night. But that's what flashlights are for. If it were my child, I would have sued for abandoning the search. They would have settled too.
Someone might rule out a vehicle if they saw someone upstanding in their mind near or exiting the vehicle. Someone that wasn't a "stranger". Trying to stir up someone's memory bank and give them a different perspective on what they saw.I believe LE's statement on the car was poorly worded. I had a difficult time trying to determine if Carter meant it was an abandoned car OR was it was a car parked near an abandoned building. One news site showed a map and indicated an address on West 300 N (6814?). Also I believe he stated the building was the 'old' DPS/CPS building on W 300 near the Hoosier Heartland Hwy. If you do a Google search you find the DPS/CPS (IN Dept of Protective Services/Child Protective Services) is not at that location but in downtown Delphi and nowhere near the trail. If this address on W 300 is correct it is right across from the trailhead. A car parked in front an abandoned building might stick out to those driving by.
But, yes, ALL of this seems odd to me as well.
Sorry if mentioned in the meantime (I'm only 11 pages behind!), but would also explain how they were able to have open caskets at their funeral(s), which occurred, as per reports at the time.Yep, she sure does say that. Weird. I guess that could explain why he wasnt covered in blood if that's the actual COD.
I'm recalling that people thought the girls had run away. Do we know WHY they thought that?Let’s remember too, even when the search was called off, doesn’t mean that family and friends weren’t still searching.
If it is true that the family left "in tears", one thing that could leave them that way is to learn that LE has bupkis more than they did 2 years ago. IMOThis was reported by at least 2 reporters who tweeted it before
the pc started. One said family was 'angry' and other said 'in tears'.
I'm recalling that people thought the girls had run away. Do we know WHY they thought that?
jmo
If it is true that the family left "in tears", one thing that could leave them that way is to learn that LE has bupkus more than they did 2 years ago. IMO
We don't know that these people are totally different. The sketches are not that similar, but eyewitness testimony is, I'm sorry to say, very often incorrect or remembering wrongly. The human mind is just not that observant unless it's been specifically trained to do so.
Also, I don't think it's fair to call the search site abandoned. Everyone involved was out well past dark, and in wooded areas far from light and near a river, I am quite certain the decision to call off the search for the night was made for safety reasons.
I think that was a technique intended to rattle him, with the added purpose of encouraging someone close to him to speak up.I've been out all day so this might have been discussed already....
I noticed Carter called the girls "two little girls" rather than by their names. I wonder if that was also a statement to the killer - could the killer be a father, step-father, brother of young girls himself? Or someone who the community trusts with young kids in particular?
jmo