That was my recollection too, he ran into an elderly man on trail.I don't quite remember that but maybe so. Thanks!
That was my recollection too, he ran into an elderly man on trail.I don't quite remember that but maybe so. Thanks!
Don't all the officers say to potential suspects, "Oh, just one more thing..."?
Just a reminder that it took 2.5 years for the police to arrest the perpetrators of the Pike County massacre.
The police were in contact with the Wagners for at least 1.5 years before their arrest. So they had the right people for a while, just couldn't prove it yet.
Perhaps, Delphi is similar where they know who did it. They just need the right pieces to prove it in court.
you know what chaps my hide? to see a sketch of the killer of these two young girls that police kept hidden from the public for two years. This is a killer on the loose for two years! The children's safety comes before any punishment. This sketch should have been released along with the make and model of the car parked at the CPS building.
Margs, just call and ask if they thought about having a fancy schmancy voice guy listen to the tape! They probably never thought of that. Recommend they turn the volume way up too, I heard that helps you hear things better.
I’m way behind so forgive me if I’m off. But didn’t the guy in Dr Phil say that the man picking up the girls encountered a guy on the trail who said he saw a couple arguing? Could that “couple” be one of the girls and BG? Maybe the guy misunderstood what he saw.
MOO
Yes. Good point.
MOO something big
has been uncovered or reported.
The poster that caught the old DA being sworn in again take the prize . (I am looking for the post.)
Robert Ives said he would come back if there were developments in the case. (or Flora arson murders.)
Well, earlier this month he was sworn back into the Delphi's DA office by Nicolas Leland, his successor AND we have an unplanned PC presenting a new suspect sketch for BG.
All in a good direction I think.
I know i am far behind but, the reason why i don’t think the perp found them through Snapchat is because snapchats only go to approved friends. Unless they friended random people they didn’t know on the app, only friends would see it. The app also lists your friends and I’m sure LE would have pursued that avenue if they did.That might be what happened causing the perp to know where they were.
Yes. Good point.
MOO something big
has been uncovered or reported.
The poster that caught the old DA being sworn in again take the prize . (I am looking for the post.)
Robert Ives said he would come back if there were developments in the case. (or Flora arson murders.)
Well, earlier this month he was sworn back into the Delphi's DA office by Nicolas Leland, his successor AND we have an unplanned PC presenting a new suspect sketch for BG.
All in a good direction I think.
Oh my, I missed that quote about the deer thank you for providing it.
I think they had been hung from a tree by the arms.
Are we looking for a particular post?So sorry, it was posted a few pages back, well actually about 12 pages or more now.
Delphi UMC Teen Ministry (@dumcteens) • Instagram photos and videos
I am something like 40 pages behind... but.. what the heck, man.
So the two sketches are not the same person.
The new sketch is bridge guy.
The first sketch is no longer POI.
But... is it another guy? Or just a figment created from the video.
Color me confused. If new sketch is BG, and old sketch was created from video of BG, then they ARE the same guy, they just think new sketch is more accurate.
But that's not what was said.
I could understand, sort of, if there were two sketches, one from FBI based on video, and one from someone else (LE? - I think local LE) based on eye witness.
Eye witnesses get a bad rap, and probably for good reason, as human memory is fallible.
BUT - why wouldn't both sketches be released?
We got this one from HERE, and this one from HERE - and we would like to speak to 'both' of these 'people'.
I just don't get that.
Like, I have already posted stuff I was pretty sure about since Monday that has now been corrected by law enforcement. I will eat that crow because I don't know better than LE, obviously I was wrong.
I think on a fundamental level we just differ in what we think it's acceptable for police to keep confidential for the security of a case. Totally fine. But in either case, what's done is done. Why continue to berate anybody for something that was or wasn't done two years ago, especially since we still clearly do not know all the reasoning and evidence behind any given action?
What exactly are we talking about here/above?But the very next paragraph says they were lying in the grass in a group of trees.
Sorry, I missed a bunch of posts.
Here’s what I think. They know who did this but don’t have quite enough evidence to arrest. I also think that perhaps the reason that Supt. Carter could be so visibly upset is that the person they suspect committed violent crimes before and/or after Abby and Libby’s murders. So just maybe he’s thinking that if the person had been caught before February 2017 (by LE wherever previous crimes were committed) the girls would be alive. Or if the suspect committed a subsequent crime, he could be feeling terrible that LE was wrong about the suspect and weren’t able to identify and arrest him, thereby allowing another crime to occur. I do not blame local LE or state police, btw. Be gentle...first post!
I just thought the post on 2/15/17 after the girls were found was very fitting to the presser April 22.Are we looking for a particular post?
Does anyone remember a man being interviewed shortly after the murders who had police show up at his home? They asked for his phone and he said he even helped in the search? He was cleared.
Could he have continually helped with local police and now this is their 90 degree turn?
I would share the news link, but it quotes his name.
I will check with a mod.