I wave the white flag on this topic..... Fine since talking about the crime as it may or may not have happened accomplishes nothing then that should end all bridge discussions as well cause it doesn't matter where they were on the bridge when the crime happened. No more maps cause thats irrelevant. The only thing we will focus on are the pics of the perp and our feelings? Can we make another thread for those of us who want to theorize and are open to hearing what others may think happened. Im not offended by anyones ideas of this crime, the more people willing to theorize the better IMO. If I'm alone on that one I will respectful remain quiet on those topics and only discuss what the thread wants.
Chiming in here since I was the one who originally posted the question to those people who are stating they think Abby was the target vs Libby or vice versa.
My point was, there are so many posts where people start their dialogue with "I think..."
I think the perp was gone from the crime scene within (x number of minutes)
I think he was visiting the cemetary
I think .... fill in any blank
Sleuthing and bouncing ideas off each other is beneficial, however, if there's no basis to why someone thinks that, then I'm at a loss as to why I should consider the point--thus my comment that I personally scroll on by comments like this. I am not telling anyone how to post....just that if the poster could give a hint as to how they came to that conclusion, it would be more helpful in putting the pieces of this horrid puzzle together.
Simply saying "I don't think he has a wife" is vague. (And I'm using hypothetical examples with all of these).
For new members, which I am one, I'd be most interested to know why you think that? Is that a characteristic to a SK (if he is one) etc.
Timelines, case maps etc are (IMO) extremely useful. They have a purpose. Get my drift? :fence: