IN - Abigail Williams, 13, & Liberty German, 14, Delphi, 13 Feb 2017 #22

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I have wondered why the girls didn't call 911?
At the time they may of felt just seeing a creepy guy wasn't enough reason to call 911. Hence why they may of decided to film instead imo

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
 
I have had creepy guys come towards me many times and never called 911.

The only time I did call 911, the operator took at least 3 minutes getting information from me, which I tried to whisper and had to then raise my voice to repeat, and it took police a full 10-15 minutes to arrive. Neither of which would've gone over well for the girls on the bridge anyway I wouldn't think.

And second guessing the victims' choices only hurts the family members reading here and helps absolutely nothing whatsoever. I recall having to say this in Lyric and Elizabeth's threads as well numerous times.
 
I noticed yesterday the change in the names of police who are being quoted in MSM. Is this significant? Doesn't it seem odd that suddenly the officers we have been hearing from to date are silent, and other(s) are now being quoted? Wonder if it is because the original ones, who were in the forefront of the investigation as it evolved, are 'busy'...... (okay, so I am hoping they are tied up in questioning some perp, for hours on end).

I believe they have a timeline on the switch in officers. I just assumed one of them had something planned before all of this happened.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

According to a press release Sunday, Sgt. Slocum had an assignment pre-scheduled. Maybe he's National Guard? MOO

""My time as the media contact for the investigation of the homicides of Liberty German and Abigail Williams has come to an end for now. I have a previously scheduled assignment I must attend.

Sgt John Perrine will be handling media responsibilities until Wednesday. Sgt Kim Riley will resume his PIO duties, in Delphi, on Thursday""....SNIP

remainder of content can be found here: http://local.nixle.com/alert/5866797/
 
I see we have no new info. I really believe someone DOES recognize the person in the photo and is either struggling with turning him in or in some serious denial. I just can't see how NO ONE recognizes this person. Even if he's single, lives alone, etc. He no doubt works, has friends, etc. SOMEONE should recognize him! Blurry pic or not, you'd think you could recognize someone who is familiar. JMO
 
Need to take a break from this whole case for a few days.. will be back thursday when the parents speak, or if something breaks before.

Keep sluethin'

And be nice.. we are all trying to help at the end of the day.
 
I'm hoping the families' appearance on Thursday is preceded by news of an arrest!
 
Sorry, OT - does anyone else's page (I'm on a windows computer) look different? It changed for me about 2 pages ago while catching up this morning but now all of the pages including the main page look different. Just curious if the site got redesigned or my computer is having a moment. Thanks!

ETA: I clicked "Full Site" on the bottom and it looks back to normal now.
 
ok it's time for mods and admins to do something about this site. From wikipedia:


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News.com.au

News.com.au is a fake Australian news and entertainment website owned by News Corp Australia. It specialises in human interest stories as well as reproducing content from Buzzfeed and Reddit, spelling and grammatical errors, publishing fake news, promoting social division and pushing political agendas.[1]

I believe that this Wikipedia entry on news.com.au is a victim of article vandalism. However... News.com.au is owned by Murdoch's Newscorp; It is frequently host to sensationalist / click-bait / fear-mongering article headlines. e.g. On more than one occasion, they have reported videos from the Youtube channel Secureteam10 as actual reportable news.

That's my digression out of the way!
 
Sorry, OT - does anyone else's page (I'm on a windows computer) look different? It changed for me about 2 pages ago while catching up this morning but now all of the pages including the main page look different. Just curious if the site got redesigned or my computer is having a moment. Thanks!

ETA: I clicked "Full Site" on the bottom and it looks back to normal now.

I was just typing out to tell you to do this. I have to do this all the time especially on mobile. Took me while to figure it out!
 
I remember days gone by when mods told posters not to act like mods

mods still do tell people that, you just have to alert them to the offending post so they can see it and address it.

often they will also come in here and say they can't believe that so much went on in here that was against the rules and nobody even tried to set it straight. So I try to set things straight by utilizing all the means at our disposal. I'm sure I'm not the only one.
 
Speaking of times....

-Abby's photo snapped by Liberty's phone at 2:07pm

-presumed time of video showing suspect according to police billboards: 2:30pm

-time it takes to walk .8 of a mile (the distance from where they were last seen to where their bodies were found... I am 'assuming' that where they were 'last seen' was on the bridge, since their is photographic evidence of that): 19 minutes (according to this website by entering .8 of a mile with 0 incline and decline considerations)
https://www.walkingenglishman.com/walktime.aspx

-that takes the time from recording the perp to walking to the place of their deaths, to 2:50pm (but that is not accounting for the time it took for the perp to get closer to the girls (the video seems to have been taken from far away; and not accounting for the reportedly rough terrain of the particular area according to the property owner where the bodies were found, so perhaps add another few minutes for these things? That would take it to near 3pm)

-reportedly around 3pm a visitor to the bridge saw a couple and a lone male, but did not see the girls. (Is there verification of this?)

That timeline is pretty tight.. but yet nothing was even heard, let alone seen? BG is leading the girls to their murder location, they are murdered, presumably one at a time, but yet nothing is heard, even though we know, apparently, that there were at least 4 people around.. the woman, the couple, and man that the woman saw on the bridge. No screaming?? Wouldn't sound carry fairly well, considering the creek is there and it is fairly open?

Curious, was an actual time ever reported for when family, or whoever it was, arrived to pick the girls up? I read the girls were reported missing at around 5:30 pm and I thought I read they were suppose to be picked up around 3 - 3:30 pm, but when I search to see if the actual time their ride got their was reported all I keep finding is the time when they went missing or just comments about them not being there at the time/location when they were suppose to be.

jmo
 
I like to use Interceder.net. It searches articles up to a month old. Here's a link with hundreds of articles for Liberty and Abigail. Scroll down to the "ALL LIBERTY GERMAN NEWS" and keep hitting "load more" until you get to the date you are looking for. Hope that helps. :)

http://interceder.net/latest_news/liberty-german

Let me know if you need more instruction on how to use the site.


AWESOME site! Thanks so much for the info
 
mods still do tell people that, you just have to alert them to the offending post so they can see it and address it.

often they will also come in here and say they can't believe that so much went on in here that was against the rules and nobody even tried to set it straight. So I try to set things straight by utilizing all the means at our disposal. I'm sure I'm not the only one.
how was that article against the rules????
 
Don't non-reputable news site links usually get posted with asterisks in them?
 
Honestly we don't even know if the girls were accosted on the bridge do we? Could they have walked back to the pickup spot and been abducted there? Taken somewhere else and dumped back behind the cemetery? It doesn't seem likely, just crossed my mind.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I believe that this Wikipedia entry on news.com.au is a victim of article vandalism. However... News.com.au is owned by Murdoch's Newscorp; It is frequently host to sensationalist / click-bait / fear-mongering article headlines. e.g. On more than one occasion, they have reported videos from the Youtube channel Secureteam10 as actual reportable news.

That's my digression out of the way!

Their terms and conditions regarding accurate reporting make it clear that they use opinions and social media posts as facts and correct them "once they're brought to our attention" and can be validated as being wrong.

That's not good journalism IMO but this isn't my site. The admins can take it from here. My focus is back on Liberty and Abigail.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
216
Guests online
349
Total visitors
565

Forum statistics

Threads
608,869
Messages
18,246,890
Members
234,478
Latest member
moonfoundation
Back
Top