Eileen730
Former Member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2010
- Messages
- 20,232
- Reaction score
- 281
Because IIRC at first they were not sureWhat made you think that?
Foul play ....
Because IIRC at first they were not sureWhat made you think that?
You might find this info on LH interesting: http://maamodt.asp.radford.edu/Psyc... from Psychology Today. All my own opinion.
[video=twitter;842747329677611009]https://twitter.com/ISPLafayette/status/842747329677611009[/video]
Sgt. Kim Riley‏@ISPLafayette 2m
2 minutes ago
The total sum of the reward is up to $231,235.00 and growing. #delphigirls
Because IIRC at first they were not sure
Foul play ....
Not really. I can't imagine what public record would lead one to determine it wasn't a sexually motivated attack, it wasn't a random attack, the situation was a set up, and that there was a personal motive.
T
I'm just too amateur.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think this guy is young.
Off school that day.
He's not a skinny guy athletic build.
I don't think it was a sexual attack either.
Why?
Not really sure but it is a feeling .
I think something else was going on.
.
IMHO for all the sleuthing I have done so far on this site and outside of this site at this point:
1. I do not believe this was random
2. I do not believe this was sexually motivated attack
3. I am not sure if they were set up, as in they thought they were meeting someone that day that the knew and instead along comes BG or if the BG was given information that the girls would be there and again the girls were set up.
4. I believe it will come to pass that there was a motive for these murders. There was someone or some persons who needed one of these girls eliminated and the other girl happened to get caught up in it is MHO at this point from all the research I have done.
i think they were told. i believe we heard that a day or two before libby's grandfather spoke.Morning WSr's.
I honestly dont think they will release the COD. Mainly because thats information that very few people know about, including BG.
That might be imformation that they want to keep close to the chest so that when they catch this perp , that its information that can be verified from him.
Just out of curiosity, i'm wondering if the parents have been told the COD or can the feds and LE withhold that information during an active investigation?
I respect your opinion and have no information or other reason to believe your opinion is wrong.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I would gauge him to be a little shorter, perhaps 5"7'-5"9'. 180-190 lbs seems about right. He resembles a man I know well, who is 5'6" and stocky in his chest.
I don't think it was a sexual attack either.
Why?
Not really sure but it is a feeling .
I think something else was going on.
.
No i can't, iirc it was posted here, from an interview he did. I guess it can be discarded as fact. But in my opinion as a sheriff of that town he did not recognize the individual(suspect) on the bridge, as it seems that none of the other officers recognize him either in my opinion. Jmo
I just hope one day we do find out what happened..
Agree. The book writer on the subject stated that he thought the guy was a killing "savant" but wasn't gifted in any other way so to speak. Their father worked in a cemetery BTW.
I dont say this to disrespect LE... LE does not always come out and tell the public everything, they tell half truths and at times flat out lie to the public when necessary for the greater good. When this first happened, it was very clear the local LE were in way over their heads, I always thought the FBI told them to not make any statements about his being a double murder until they were there and able to assist. LE's statements are scripted those are not just random thoughts.... When they said at first they didnt know if foul play was involved, I believe that was a strategic move.... they knew darn well those girls had been murdered. IDK the girls clothes are scattered in the creek and they are dead? Im not LE and if I walked onto that scene I wouldnt think two athletic girls went skinny dipping in February in a creek and drowned in water, that they could have stood up in and walked out of... JMHO
LE stated they did not believe there was any foul-play during the search for the girls. Once the girls were found, they immediately declared it a homicide based on "how the bodies were found."
I'm not sure if that rules out drowning or not, just wanted to clear up the confusion about the use of "no foul play" by LE.
All of this info is available in the first thread.