In regard to RL not being truthful.. here is what I have been thinking.
People showed up at his door on Feb 13th at 6:30pm, when he got home, according to him. Not sure if, after the neighbour/search party volunteer asked him if they could search his land, the police may have also had a discussion with him.
In any case, he may have been intoxicated at the time? Or not.
Then the following day around noon, the bodies are found on his land. I'm sure that since this was the case, RL would have been one of the very first people questioned by police.
Whatever the details and specifics of his court cases and probation and sentences are at, we may not be privy to everything at this point. Perhaps he is or isn't allowed to drive at this point. Do we even know whether RL has a drivers license any more? Is it possible he could have let it go for whatever reason? Do we know for sure that he doesn't have yet another DUI in the works for which he has not yet been convicted, but he may still have stipulations in effect which do not allow him to drive?
I'm thinking that he may have told officers that he was not home, and that he had gone wherever, and he was driven there by Mr.X. (Perhaps a friend?). And police took it at face value. Then later on, when police started to backtrack when they saw how many tips they had and yet nothing was really yielding results, or even just later on in the course of the investigation... they get to the point where they are now questioning Mr.X, and Mr.X says, um no, I did not drive RL anywhere that day. Or.. the fish store had video, which was reviewed and he was not on the video.. whatever. Maybe RL was drinking in the bar, or doing some other thing that he shouldn't have been doing, but he couldn't tell police that because he knew he'd be screwing himself, for whatever reason. So then they requestion RL, and they find out he lied, and why. So they take him into custody, LE is massively PO'd at him for lying, and now LE is faced with once again clearing RL.. but perhaps it is not so easy. RL was supposed to have had an alibi, but sometimes whatever one is doing at a certain time cannot be corroborated by anyone. So now they possibly cannot clear him one way or the other.
I was thinking it was awfully strict that they had taken RL into custody at *this* particular time, just because of how bad it will look to the community. This could explain that. And now they have searched his buildings and home, and taken what is presumably his vehicle to see if they can find anything that will conclude one thing or another. If they find DNA from the girls in his vehicle, he'll be in a boatload of trouble. If they find no sign of the girls, then whatever his *new* alibi is, might carry more weight.
LE were quoted as saying the BG is about 30 years younger than RL. It has been said on here that his gait is the same, the way he holds his shoulders and arms is the same, etc., but I'm finding none of that to be true. To me, it looks like his gait isn't the same at all. BG's knees come up much higher than RL's while walking. RL looks like he is much stouter than BG to me. BG looks to me like he has chin hair, which is salt and peppered. There are a few photos of other men I've seen which look much closer to BG than RL does. And it just doesn't make sense to me that RL would kill the girls or bring their bodies to his very own land. And I can't see him giving interviews to the media like that, saying 'down the hill, walking the land, etc., if it was him. Doesn't add up. Nevermind that the man is almost 80 years old, and has lived there in the same place for over 50 years. I haven't heard of any violence or sexual type of charges in the past against him. One doesn't just suddenly, just before he turns 80, turn into a child killer, does one?
Is it possible that RL is protecting someone, and refusing to cooperate about that potential person, and so police are laying it on thick in the hopes that he'll crack?
People showed up at his door on Feb 13th at 6:30pm, when he got home, according to him. Not sure if, after the neighbour/search party volunteer asked him if they could search his land, the police may have also had a discussion with him.
In any case, he may have been intoxicated at the time? Or not.
Then the following day around noon, the bodies are found on his land. I'm sure that since this was the case, RL would have been one of the very first people questioned by police.
Whatever the details and specifics of his court cases and probation and sentences are at, we may not be privy to everything at this point. Perhaps he is or isn't allowed to drive at this point. Do we even know whether RL has a drivers license any more? Is it possible he could have let it go for whatever reason? Do we know for sure that he doesn't have yet another DUI in the works for which he has not yet been convicted, but he may still have stipulations in effect which do not allow him to drive?
I'm thinking that he may have told officers that he was not home, and that he had gone wherever, and he was driven there by Mr.X. (Perhaps a friend?). And police took it at face value. Then later on, when police started to backtrack when they saw how many tips they had and yet nothing was really yielding results, or even just later on in the course of the investigation... they get to the point where they are now questioning Mr.X, and Mr.X says, um no, I did not drive RL anywhere that day. Or.. the fish store had video, which was reviewed and he was not on the video.. whatever. Maybe RL was drinking in the bar, or doing some other thing that he shouldn't have been doing, but he couldn't tell police that because he knew he'd be screwing himself, for whatever reason. So then they requestion RL, and they find out he lied, and why. So they take him into custody, LE is massively PO'd at him for lying, and now LE is faced with once again clearing RL.. but perhaps it is not so easy. RL was supposed to have had an alibi, but sometimes whatever one is doing at a certain time cannot be corroborated by anyone. So now they possibly cannot clear him one way or the other.
I was thinking it was awfully strict that they had taken RL into custody at *this* particular time, just because of how bad it will look to the community. This could explain that. And now they have searched his buildings and home, and taken what is presumably his vehicle to see if they can find anything that will conclude one thing or another. If they find DNA from the girls in his vehicle, he'll be in a boatload of trouble. If they find no sign of the girls, then whatever his *new* alibi is, might carry more weight.
LE were quoted as saying the BG is about 30 years younger than RL. It has been said on here that his gait is the same, the way he holds his shoulders and arms is the same, etc., but I'm finding none of that to be true. To me, it looks like his gait isn't the same at all. BG's knees come up much higher than RL's while walking. RL looks like he is much stouter than BG to me. BG looks to me like he has chin hair, which is salt and peppered. There are a few photos of other men I've seen which look much closer to BG than RL does. And it just doesn't make sense to me that RL would kill the girls or bring their bodies to his very own land. And I can't see him giving interviews to the media like that, saying 'down the hill, walking the land, etc., if it was him. Doesn't add up. Nevermind that the man is almost 80 years old, and has lived there in the same place for over 50 years. I haven't heard of any violence or sexual type of charges in the past against him. One doesn't just suddenly, just before he turns 80, turn into a child killer, does one?
Is it possible that RL is protecting someone, and refusing to cooperate about that potential person, and so police are laying it on thick in the hopes that he'll crack?
