JaimeSommers
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2012
- Messages
- 2,408
- Reaction score
- 113
I think we should leave the "drug theory" alone. This isn't the first murdered child where out of the blue the discussion is all about meth addicts, drug deals, and so much more that is in no way connected to the murdered children. It's a theme that people want to inject into missing children for whatever odd reason, but it has yet to be true in any case that I've followed on this forum.
This is about a man who cornered two children in a rural park, herded them to a secluded location, very likely sexually assaulted one, murdered her, then the other, then murdered her. Then he left the area. That's all we know.
I respectfully disagree that "we know" everything BBM above. We don't know the girls were "cornered." We don't know they were "herded." We don't know what happened before they were murdered. We can all imagine and suppose, but all we really know right now is that they were murdered. The rest is purely conjecture.
(I agree that drugs are not the connection in this case, but I don't think it's absurd to float the theory.)
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk