Nope - speculating that he accessed the bridge from the SE end of the bridge, but why would he park at the cemetery and dress in a way that would obscure his identity if he didn't have a targeted victim(s) and a plan? Was he parked at the North entrance when people were arriving at the park - looking for a victim - and then he put his plan into action? If so, people who were at the park need to think harder about what they saw at the parking area that day between 11 and 1PM.
And that could help me wrap my head around crossing the creek with the girls. If he had crossed it once, then he knew where to cross the other way. One question though, his shoes or boots, don't look like waders or wellies. Has he taken them off?
Isn't there also a path from the cemetery and CS on the North side of the creek that leads across the creek via the Monon High Bridge? No need to get wet trousers then and it would put BG on the bridge walking South as shown in the video stills. JMO.
As the other two charges were pleaded out then LE may not have had enough evidence. The TS charge was on video so was admitted to. He lied about driving himself IMO but they had the video evidence. The other two must have been about drinking alcohol and having access to his car so those two were not pushed as he admitted the TS offence. MOO.I agree, good question. A recent charge of obstruction of justice means he attempted to pervert the course of justice by misleading LE in some way during an investigation. Could this have to do with his alibi? Of course this is purely speculation on my part.
Good morning Otto!
Let me try to see where you are going with this. So, parking at the cemetery. But are you saying he walked across the bridge (from north to south) and laid wait, and then entered the bridge from the south once the girls were on? Or are you saying that he waded across the creek and then entered the bridge from the south?
I have a question for you; if he did park at the cemetery, do you think it possible he used the deer stand to scope things out?
This is how I think he got across but, when reading Otto's scenario, I remembered how Julie Melvin remarked in her video that you could practically get across before you would get wet. So, hmmm.
Have a good one !
Off to the trenches to earn a pretty penny.
Was it deer season February 13? I've wondered this myself. Unless it was his deer stand, it would seem unlikely he would park himself on someone else's stand if it were deer season and there was a chance the owner would be using it. JMO
That's cheeky! Get us discussing your theories and leave us in the middle!:fence:
Great post, and MOO is BG is wearing a disguise. He could have bought it just before the murders at a Rural King or some other store here in the Midwest. .
I agree with you here. BG jeans are probably not only new, but could be a variant of the Tuff Skins line that I used to wear when I worked in industrial plants. These jeans have extra thick denim to prevent tears. When new, they are very stiff and even hurt a little when squatting. To me, this possible "touch" reduces the possibility of a disguise as it shows true knowledge of the "look".members have commented on the jeans, to me they look stiff, as in not broken in.
It seems to me someone made a connection with the meat packing plant? Not sure if it was in Iowa, though.Good Morning!
I'm curious about everyone's thoughts about how this unfolded.
I'm assuming that the suspect parked his vehicle in the trees at the South end of the cemetery, and that he accessed the bridge from the SE end. If that is true, was he at the North entrance to the park when the girls arrived? Did he have another victim in mind, perhaps he saw a single woman in the parking area? What led him to park in a secluded area and look for a victim in the park?
Also, given that there is a somewhat similar murder 5 years ago in Iowa, is there an industry that is common in Iowa and Indiana, and a job that doesn't involve long hauling? Although it may seem unlikely that two similar murders five years apart are related, look at Joran van der Sloot - two similar murders five years apart.
Me too! And my anxiety stuff. I so enjoy it here. Everyone is so dedicated to these angels it warms my heart. Today IS the day!NVM I need :coffeews:
Was it deer season February 13? I've wondered this myself. Unless it was his deer stand, it would seem unlikely he would park himself on someone else's stand if it were deer season and there was a chance the owner would be using it. JMO
Was it deer season February 13? I've wondered this myself. Unless it was his deer stand, it would seem unlikely he would park himself on someone else's stand if it were deer season and there was a chance the owner would be using it. JMO
Her video came much later. Someone posted charts of the creek levels over the month somewhere upthread. Levels had dropped dramatically since 2/12
Nope - speculating that he accessed the bridge from the SE end of the bridge, but why would he park at the cemetery and dress in a way that would obscure his identity if he didn't have a targeted victim(s) and a plan? Was he parked at the North entrance when people were arriving at the park - looking for a victim - and then he put his plan into action? If so, people who were at the park need to think harder about what they saw at the parking area that day between 11 and 1PM.
Yes, RL's picture has been messed with. However, back 4,5, 6 threads ago, someone had someone compare RL and BG side by side, with no manipulation whatsoever. (Except to put them side by side). Don't know why people have since fooled with the comparison. There was no need. That comparison alone was haunting, to say the least. I can't recall who the poster was either.No. The photo of the property owner has been augmented so that his coat is the same shape as the suspect's coat, and the pants are equally augmented.