I'm inclined to believe he had a vehicle parked under the south end of the bridge and abducted them there and then brought them back after the search that night via the cemetery parking at the rear. He could have listened to scanner traffic or even have been a volunteer searching, knowing when it would be safe to return. If an Amber alert had been called, he may well have decided to take them elsewhere . JMO.
So today I watched​ episode three or four of 13 Reasons Why (I know, I know) where they held the Halloween costume party. A few of the jocks wore costumes with snorkels, and each guy wore protective goggles loosely around his neck. I've never had a strong opinion about what BG had around his neck, but now I'm thinking that it could be goggles like this.
The above is just my opinion.
What program do you guys use I'm using gimp and it's not that great imo. If you don't mind sharing
What I don't understand is if the video/audio was truly more revealing than the pic and "down the hill" clip why wouldn't they have said he was the main suspect from the get go... instead of saying he was someone they just wanted to interview to see what he had seen? Has anyone explored that on the threads or is it just they didn't want to reveal what they knew?
If you were asking me, I just have an older version of Paint Shop Pro. 8.1, I think,
Thanks for all the comments about the other picture. I'm afraid this one didn't turn out looking quite as normal, but the original isn't quite as clear. I know the head looks a bit too small and somewhat lopsided, but I don't want to change it because I have no idea what to change it to. I wish there was more that could be done with the face, but I don't want to try doing more than just changing contrast, brightness, color saturation, and other things that don't really change the look (just the amount of it's that's visible.)
View attachment 115565
Thanks for all the comments about the other picture. I'm afraid this one didn't turn out looking quite as normal, but the original isn't quite as clear. I know the head looks a bit too small and somewhat lopsided, but I don't want to change it because I have no idea what to change it to. I wish there was more that could be done with the face, but I don't want to try doing more than just changing contrast, brightness, color saturation, and other things that don't really change the look (just the amount of it's that's visible.)
View attachment 115565
Can the same person please do a picture like that with the other photo of him too.He might appear to look a little older in that picture.
LE has stated BG is most likely middle-aged. (45-65)
I was just about to make the same comment and request!
I always thought that BG looked quite a bit older in the 2nd pic (actually a couple of decades or so to me!). Very odd.
LE has stated BG is most likely middle-aged. (45-65)
I'm thinking one picture was more in the light sun and the other not as light out.Maybe they were at different times? or positions? I don't know.
One of our fellow posters who studied the pics estimated they were .5 seconds apart, so just a few frames. If that is accurate (I believe it is) the change is from turning away from the sun. moo
Sorry I don't have a link to credit the poster who did the work.
I've wondered about this as well. Perhaps if this case is tied up with other similar cases (MOO) LE may have needed to clear it way up the chain before releasing it...?
The above is just my opinion.