BBM
Yeah, this bolded sentence is what I've been trying to say... well, said way way back in the first thread anyway. While I get that we haven't heard one way or the other if something was actually stolen (although the debit card seems was), it just seems to me that the burglary was not of much interest. Small things HAD to be what was stolen if anything. B/c the perp was not carrying anything visible or big in the camera footage. And the SUV was not noted to have returned.
SO.... I am of the opinion that the perp did not actually have burglary as the main goal with the Blackburn case. IMO, no matter how the situation escalated to where the perp shot Amanda, the guy would have at least taken off with a bounty. Why shoot a person dead and get little from it? Granted, he could have something valuable and small, like jewelry or something, but I'd still think he'd want to grab what he could. They had an SUV after all.
The other thing that makes me think this is that it was stated that LE was still trying to determine with DB what if anything was stolen. If you're still having to determine this, days after the event, methinks that there was nothing much of value gone. I feel like DB would quickly know what they had of value- jewelry, art, electronics. They weren't uber wealthy and I'd imagine wouldn't have a tone of stuff like that. There was a picture of a huge lovely flatscreen t.v in their living room. And DB made mention of it at some point in a sermon. All to say that I don't think it would have been hard to say what was stolen. So I think very little was. And that makes me think the perp did not have burglary as his priority. MOO.