Safeguard
On Time Out
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2015
- Messages
- 2,289
- Reaction score
- 5,710
Do tell...I wonder where the families stayed the night before the tragedy? Seems like an unimportant question, but I have my reasons for asking.
Do tell...I wonder where the families stayed the night before the tragedy? Seems like an unimportant question, but I have my reasons for asking.
Maybe his atty. advised him against it , but S.A said 'bleep' with that ?I can’t believe his defense atty. was for him doing interviews. So maybe yet one more example of his defiance.
Shock? Hope against hope? Who could accept what happened, if it happened to them? Not me. That's for sure!Does that even make sense? How could he look for her on the floor and then see her fall? She would have already been on the ground by then. He is a lying liar who lies, IMHO.
I couldn't really tell that from the video.On the video it doesn’t seem that he is looking on the floor at all. MOO
Not believing something one saw with their own eyes is a thing. Particularly when traumatized.Well, did he see her fall or was he looking for her on the floor? Those are two different things, not possible at the same time .
rsbbmIt was almost violent the way he threw her up past his head really bothered me
It was definitely very forceful.The way he picked up Chloe has always bothered me. He didn’t cuddle her, he threw her up in the air. He could’ve just lifted her to his hip and then arranged her on the railing. It was almost violent the way he threw her up past his head really bothered me
Thank you, Arkay ... it is a most intensely tragic situation going on here. The Aussie WS members that I chat with are safe, but it is certainly all encroaching on where each of us live, and is very scary and very sad. Thank goodness for our hero firefighters is all we can say.
Having my sister with family living in Australia, I really feel for you, stay safe!
His defense attorney seems to be competent and experienced, so I would be astonished if he OK'd the interviews. Which leaves two possibilities: SA agreed to do the interviews without telling his lawyer; or he told his lawyer, who strongly advised against doing them, yet SA decided that he knew better and would disregard his lawyer's advice. With everything we know about SA, I'm leaning towards option 2.I can’t believe his defense atty. was for him doing interviews. So maybe yet one more example of his defiance.
Well, in all honesty, considering what he was doing with the poor baby, and... he IS a 51 y/o man.... Any normal, half way responsible adult that age, would no doubt be able to have enough foresight to anticipate the consequences of his, either off the charts reckless, careless, and totally moronic actions... Or, was it his His intentional criminal actions.Shock? Hope against hope? Who could accept what happened, if it happened to them? Not me. That's for sure!
bbmThe CBS interview seemed like someone's idea to garner sympathy for SA. Perhaps they had an agreement with CBS on the parameters of the interview. To me, Winkleman's fingerprints are all over that interview because SA was obviously coached to state the party line for the RCCL law suit (he says the same thing that the mom says in her second interview):
If there was some kind of warning sign, we wouldn't even have been near it. We wouldn't even have been near it."
"Who do you blame in this situation?" Begnaud asked.
"The more and more days go by, you know, initially I couldn't — I couldn't help but blame myself. But I know that — I know that I — if there was a sign, if there was something that indicated there was a chance for that window to be an opening, that this wouldn't happen," Anello said.
"You blame the cruise line?" Begnaud asked.
"I do," he said. "I just want them to fix the boat. Just fix it. Just fix the boat."
You forgot to say "imo".It was definitely very forceful.
How do you know he was watching the window?!He was watching the window, talked to the baby, then waited a few seconds, then made a direct beeline straight for the open window
Yes, I thought he may have been drinking a lot there. Hence, refusing the breathalyzer. JMOI wonder where the families stayed the night before the tragedy? Seems like an unimportant question, but I have my reasons for asking.
The video I was referring to was of the regular dressed man giving his own account of the puppet video. The Charlton YouTube video. He was the person calling Chloe an “it”...not the puppet.
Read the thread.Was this the video in Spanish? In the Spanish video, I heard them saying, "mira eso" or "mira esto" which is like "look at that" or "look at this." My Spanish is so-so. I was hoping there would be a translation of the video from La Comay.