It feels uncomfortable to me that some are willing to blame what happened on the children playing with various instruments that are inside the car. I thought the children, ages 5, 2,and 1, were asleep. I just don't see sleepy children waking up after midnight to play with interior mechanical knobs and such in the dark, especially, if they're buckled into their car seats.
Kyle was last on his phone at 12:38am. Was he fishing at the time or was he inside the car? How did Kyle know the fence was down that allowed visitors to enter at that particular spot as the resident said it'd only been open about a month.
Back in the day when I was a younger form of myself, I bought a Saab with a turbocharged engine. 0 to 60 in seconds and all that jazz. That Saab would fly. While I don't know if Kyle enjoyed a fast car but when given the choice of a more conservative vehicle for carrying 3 toddlers out and about, then why choose a Saab? Perhaps the price was right.
The 2007 Saab, depending on who previously owned it, probably had been driven hard. Driving on a donut tire is not safe but surely he intended to replace that donut as he had the windshield. It seems to me that replacing the donut would be more important than replacing a windshield but IN laws require a windshield to be replaced if there's a crack obstructing the driver's view.
Indiana Windshield Crack Laws - Cracked Windshield Laws
Just humble opinions w/ wishes things had been different for those sweet babies wearing such adorable clothes.