SmoothOperator
Sadly what connects all these puzzles is that ther
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2010
- Messages
- 5,591
- Reaction score
- 76
Don't you all wonder about these "tips" that come in?? I mean if they're legitimate tips then they are coming from someone who most likely has direct knowledge at the very least of some part of the crime.. Even if it's after the fact in the disposal of the body..or being told significant details about a part of the crime..
So say that's the case..that this tipster has been told certain and/or significant details of the crime.. Say theyve been told more than one detail, like she was killed in a specific apt, with a knife, and the body disposed in this particular spot..
They then call the tip hotline and tell where this disposal spot was but do not give the other details that they know.. Because a) they figure that in finding the body will be enough for LE to solve the rest and b) bEcause they do not want to talk, tell, or be in any way involved in the whole mess..
So then what if he has misunderstood or was even lied to about the actual disposal area but all the other details are infact 100% accurate and true.. But LE only has the one part about the disposal site and it was wrong so that leaves them no closer to finding Lauren.. Tipster is already freaked out wouldn't dare ever call in another tip mainly for the reason that it would be blatantly obvious to the murder that the person he confided in had gone to LE and tipped them off with those specific details he had told confidant..
So with the tips being 100% anonymous are you telling me that they are nit able to track down who it was that gave them this tip.. That no didn't pan out.. But they also know there is a possibility that just as I described ^above^ the tipster very likely may have other extremely impoertant and accurate details of the crime that would indeed lead them to solving the case..
So this anonymous deal allow for this tipster to go unfound, with no further talking to and delving into to see if he indeed possibly had more info that would lead to Lauren..
Surely the anonymity doesn't allow something like that to happen does it??
So say that's the case..that this tipster has been told certain and/or significant details of the crime.. Say theyve been told more than one detail, like she was killed in a specific apt, with a knife, and the body disposed in this particular spot..
They then call the tip hotline and tell where this disposal spot was but do not give the other details that they know.. Because a) they figure that in finding the body will be enough for LE to solve the rest and b) bEcause they do not want to talk, tell, or be in any way involved in the whole mess..
So then what if he has misunderstood or was even lied to about the actual disposal area but all the other details are infact 100% accurate and true.. But LE only has the one part about the disposal site and it was wrong so that leaves them no closer to finding Lauren.. Tipster is already freaked out wouldn't dare ever call in another tip mainly for the reason that it would be blatantly obvious to the murder that the person he confided in had gone to LE and tipped them off with those specific details he had told confidant..
So with the tips being 100% anonymous are you telling me that they are nit able to track down who it was that gave them this tip.. That no didn't pan out.. But they also know there is a possibility that just as I described ^above^ the tipster very likely may have other extremely impoertant and accurate details of the crime that would indeed lead them to solving the case..
So this anonymous deal allow for this tipster to go unfound, with no further talking to and delving into to see if he indeed possibly had more info that would lead to Lauren..
Surely the anonymity doesn't allow something like that to happen does it??