There is enough evidence to charge JA (or grandma, not sure who has custodial responsibility) with negligence if LE wants to. Discussing red flags till sunup won't bring Shaylyn back or change that.
http://www.in.gov/dcs/files/3.08_Statutory_Definition_of_CAN.pdf
Someone asked several pages back about the difference between rape and child rape and how rage or control comes into play vs. sexual gratification. Here is a somewhat scholarly, yet hopefully thorough answer:
Since rape involves sexual behavior, it was long believed to
be primarily motivated by sexual impulse...this confusion of context with motivation was clarified
mainly by the work of Nicholas Groth, who published a typology of rapists in the
1970’s. Groth labeled each type based on the principle motivation manifested by
the rapists in that group.
The two primary and numerically largest types identified by Groth were
the “power” rapist and the “anger” rapist. The power rapist was motivated by his
need to control and dominate his victim, and inversely, to avoid being controlled
by her. The anger rapist was motivated by resentment and a general hostility
towards women, and was more prone to inflicting gratuitous violence in the
course of a rape. Not surprisingly, these types were rarely found in pure form.
Most rapists were actually blends of power and anger motivations.
The third and (thankfully) numerically far smaller type was the sadistic
rapist. This rapist was motivated by the sexual gratification he experienced when
he inflicted pain on his victim. The sadistic rapist has become a staple of the
American media, but these, once again, extremely rare cases.
Groth’s identification of anger and power as the primary motivations
behind rape has endured, and has become the basis for attempts at defining more
refined taxonomies of rape. These efforts have largely yielded modest results, and
have focused on identifying blends of power and anger motivations, and on
distinguishing developmental antecedents for the various types. Not surprisingly,
among those developmental antecedents, one of the most prominent is a history
of childhood abuse. Sexual abuse, physical abuse and neglect are all significantly
more prevalent in the backgrounds of rapists than in the backgrounds of nonoffending
men. 1
Child sexual abusers are often characterized as exhibiting poor social skills, having feelings of inadequacy or loneliness, or being passive in relationships (Groth, 1979; Marshall, 1993). They differ from rapists with respect to thought processes and affect, and often describe their offending behaviors as uncontrollable, stable, and internal, whereas rapists attribute their offenses to external, unstable, and controllable causes (Garlick, Marshall, & Thorton, 1996). Child sexual abusers display deficits in information-processing skills and maintain cognitive distortions to deny the impact of their offenses (e.g., having sex with a child is normative; Hayashino, Wurtele, & Klebe, 1995).
In contrast, rapists display distorted perceptions of women and sex roles, and often blame the victim for their offense (Polaschek, Ward, & Hudson, 1997). With respect to affect, child sexual abusers assault to alleviate anxiety, loneliness, and depression. Rapists typically assault as a result of anger, hostility, and vindictiveness (Polaschek, Ward, & Hudson, 1997). Many of these characteristics have been incorporated into the typologies of rapists and child sexual abusers (Camilleri & Quinsey, 2008; Groth, 1979; Knight & Prentky, 1990). 2
1
http://www.middlebury.edu/media/view/240951/original/PredatoryNature.pdf
2
http://www.smart.gov/SOMAPI/sec1/ch3_typology.html
Another good article on Pedophiles:
http://neuroanthropology.net/2010/05/10/inside-the-mind-of-a-pedophile/