IN - Subway's Jared Fogle - plea deal in federal child *advertiser censored* case, 2015

[Magdalyn]

Did anyone here ever figure out how Jared and Russell Taylor originally met? I find it highly unlikely Jared just happened to start a CHILDREN'S foundation and just happened to hire a director who is not only into child *advertiser censored*, but secretly films his own kids. Such kismet! :waiting:

I'm wondering if they met in a child *advertiser censored* chat room/exchange group.

 

[bluesneakers]

Did anyone here ever figure out how Jared and Russell Taylor originally met? I find it highly unlikely Jared just happened to start a CHILDREN'S foundation and just happened to hire a director who is not only into child *advertiser censored*, but secretly films his own kids. Such kismet! :waiting:

I'm wondering if they met in a child *advertiser censored* chat room/exchange group.

That's my best guess too.

 

[Magdalyn]

This is just a hunch, not based on anything I've read about the case....

I'm guessing that Jerod was into teenage girls and that's who he solicited for his own sexual pleasure. I'm thinking that the images of the much-younger kids was for sharing or selling. He has a past of making money from distributing *advertiser censored* (the video business he had in college) and perhaps the images of children filled his desire for money and perhaps he got pleasure in exploiting both the victims and the buyers.

I think he got off on being the "aw shucks, I lost weight on Subway" every-man hero while at the same time having dirty, secret side businesses. The images of the young kids was part of his dirty double life, while when he actually wanted sex on the side, he wanted a teen, imo.

I suppose it doesn't really matter. The bottom line is he victimized people.

Respectfully, Jared's net worth is 15 million dollars. I really don't believe he looked at child *advertiser censored* of 6 year olds as an 'easy' way to earn money. And, he wasn't charged with distributing, I don't believe. So it seems he acquired it for personal use. Also, if he got it from Russell Taylor, I don't buy that he couldn't control what was sent to/given to him. He was his boss. He kept what was sent to him. Why keep it if it's repugnant to him. When it could incriminate him.

Because to non-pedophiles, that stuff is vomit inducing repugnant. I would set my laptop on fire if that were ever sent to me. Okay, I'd report it to the FBI, but Jared could have torched that computer, the thumb drives, and streamlined his *advertiser censored* requests to be exclusively Lolita-esque, if that's all he was into.

I can imagine Jared would prefer everyone think he's only into post-pubescent Lolita-esque girls, and not 6 year olds or 9 year olds. Some find that idea more 'acceptable'.

Some, I imagine, found it impossible to believe that dude who seemed so nice and dweeby could possibly be involved in child *advertiser censored* at all. I think it's likely to be common to want to believe that the youngest he desired was post-pubescent 15, 16, 17 year olds.

IMO, if he had child *advertiser censored* of 6 year olds and 9 year olds on his computer, it was because he liked it.

 

[Inthedetails]

Respectfully, Jared's net worth is 15 million dollars. I really don't believe he looked at child *advertiser censored* of 6 year olds as an 'easy' way to earn money. And, he wasn't charged with distributing, I don't believe. So iy seems he acquired it for personal use. Also, if he got it from Russell Taylor, I don't buy that he couldn't control what was sent to/given to him. He was his boss. He kept the crap. Why keep it if it's repugnant to him. When it could incriminate him.

Because to non-pedophiles, that stuff is vomit inducing repugnant. I would set my laptop on fire if that were ever sent to me.

I can imagine Jared would prefer everyone think he's only into post-pubescent Lolita-esque girls, and not 6 year olds or 9 year olds. Some find that idea more 'acceptable'.

Some, I imagine, found it impossible to believe that dude who seemed so nice and dweeby could possibly be involved in child *advertiser censored* at all. I think it's likely to be common to want to believe that the youngest he desired was post-pubescent 15, 16, 17 year olds.

IMO, if he had child *advertiser censored* of 6 year olds and 9 year olds on his computer, it was because he liked it.

Yes, you're probably right.

(FWIW, I think he gets off on the double-life and the dirtiness of the *advertiser censored* business while being a dorky spokesperson, not necessarily that he needed to add money to his millions.)

 

[Inthedetails]

Meet the Florida journalist who took down Jared Fogle

http://nypost.com/2015/08/20/meet-the-florida-journalist-who-took-down-jared-fogle/

 

[SCHMAE]

This is just a hunch, not based on anything I've read about the case....

I'm guessing that Jerod was into teenage girls and that's who he solicited for his own sexual pleasure. I'm thinking that the images of the much-younger kids was for sharing or selling. He has a past of making money from distributing *advertiser censored* (the video business he had in college) and perhaps the images of children filled his desire for money and perhaps he got pleasure in exploiting both the victims and the buyers.

I think he got off on being the "aw shucks, I lost weight on Subway" every-man hero while at the same time having dirty, secret side businesses. The images of the young kids was part of his dirty double life, while when he actually wanted sex on the side, he wanted a teen, imo.

I suppose it doesn't really matter. The bottom line is he victimized people.

While it is possible that his main interest was in teenage girls , although minors, I have a theory when it comes to child *advertiser censored* and pedophiles in general. It's very GW Bush and it goes like this. " You're either with us or you're against us''. A person who finds it appropriate to buy , sell, transport *advertiser censored* images of 6 yr old children does not FIND the idea as disturbing as the rest of us. There is just no middle ground. You're either ANTI child *advertiser censored* or you are not and if all of the images and his victims were 16 yrs old, I'd find that theory a little more plausible but you do not make money off of 6 yr old nude photos while being ADAMENTLY anti child *advertiser censored*. I just cannot connect the two. Fogle is not ' with us'. He's against us. He's a monster . It's moo and apparently it's true.

 

[seattlechiquita]

Did anyone here ever figure out how Jared and Russell Taylor originally met? I find it highly unlikely Jared just happened to start a CHILDREN'S foundation and just happened to hire a director who is not only into child *advertiser censored*, but secretly films his own kids. Such kismet! :waiting:

I'm wondering if they met in a child *advertiser censored* chat room/exchange group.

OMFG where the kids in the videos RT's children? What a sick *advertiser censored* SOB etc etc. I am about to puke.

 

[Magdalyn]

OMFG where the kids in the videos RT's children? What a sick *advertiser censored* SOB etc etc. I am about to puke.

http://www.theindychannel.com/news/local-news/read-jared-fogle-plea-agreement

page 14

You have to put two and two together. In Russell's indictment, he admitted to secretly recording his children. He lied about the why of it, but he admitted it. So he recorded his children, and shared it with Jared.

Same page also mentions how Russell provided him with child *advertiser censored*, pictures and videos, with a child victim as young as approximately 6 years of age.

 

[seattlechiquita]

http://www.theindychannel.com/news/local-news/read-jared-fogle-plea-agreement

page 14

You have to put two and two together. In Russell's indictment, he admitted to secretly recording his children. He lied about the why of it, but he admitted it. So he recorded his children, and shared it with Jared.

Same page also mentions how Russell provided him with child *advertiser censored*, pictures and videos, with a child victim as young as approximately 6 years of age.

Sweet Mother Earth. This is not something i can even BEGIN to comprehend. I cannot.

 

[Paulas88]

Meet the Florida journalist who took down Jared Fogle

http://nypost.com/2015/08/20/meet-the-florida-journalist-who-took-down-jared-fogle/

Hmmm, this article says he was interested in "boys or girls".

I bet there's so much grossness we'll never hear, that's why he took
A plea.

 

[Ixchel13]

Ugh.. ugh.. Those poor kids..

As for Jared, The fact that they left him there and that he was not arrested bodes well. Everyone I know whose home was raided for child *advertiser censored*, Was taken into custody immediately.

I am hoping that this turns out to not include him.

ahhhhyeaahhhh....not.

 

[Coppertop15]

Forgive me if this is stupid, but could the leaving the country clause have anything to do with Israel? I believe he had his bar mitzvah there. I don't know if he has return connections.

 

[LaborDayRN]

Forgive me if this is stupid, but could the leaving the country clause have anything to do with Israel? I believe he had his bar mitzvah there. I don't know if he has return connections.

I was thinking along the lines of Indonesia's involvement in human (child) sex trafficking. There are people who travel there for this very reason. It turns my stomach. I'm curious if Jared has any history of travelling there.
http://www.unicef.org/indonesia/UNICEF_Indonesia_Child_Trafficking_Fact_Sheet_-_July_2010.pdf

 

[LaborDayRN]

I hope they have frozen his assets.

 

[bluesneakers]

http://www.theindychannel.com/news/local-news/read-jared-fogle-plea-agreement

page 14

You have to put two and two together. In Russell's indictment, he admitted to secretly recording his children. He lied about the why of it, but he admitted it. So he recorded his children, and shared it with Jared.

Same page also mentions how Russell provided him with child *advertiser censored*, pictures and videos, with a child victim as young as approximately 6 years of age.

I'm not sure why but for some reason it seems extra repulsive he watched videos of his friend's children like this. I suspect he was doing more than just "watching." What must it have been like if he spent time with those kids in a social setting? Did he look at them and... ugh. I can barely think about it.

 

[bluesneakers]

Forgive me if this is stupid, but could the leaving the country clause have anything to do with Israel? I believe he had his bar mitzvah there. I don't know if he has return connections.

Are there any countries who won't extradite for child *advertiser censored* charges?

 

[zoey]

Hmmm, this article says he was interested in "boys or girls".

I bet there's so much grossness we'll never hear, that's why he took
A plea.

I agree. Disgusted by this

 

[Ixchel13]

I've never liked Jared. And this is after he was a regular
customer, I mean every week, at my restaurant for years, this was beginning right when he was starting the foundation. And to get home here in BTown, I would pass the subway he lived above every day.
He gave off creepy vibes. When I said that, people would actually diss me, it was like I was saying Santa was a **** or Mother Teresa was a ho. And why? Guy's claim to fame was losing weight, big whoop!

Scarlett, I know you wondered upthread if there was a bit of a difference from actually abusing a child and "merely" watching the child *advertiser censored*. Perhaps. You said that before Jared was arrested and is now going to plead guilty. Now that he has proven to be a craven, hypocritical,heinously depraved pervert, does that answer your question?
I'm not saying it rudely, I am being genuine, because
people like Jared, and the Duggars, sometimes receive some sort of special consideration and it takes a long time for people to come around to their guilt. IMO.

Although the Duggars haven't AS YET been linked to child *advertiser censored*; they are friends with, associate with, and have utilized the counsel of a known child pornographer
and to actually deal with the problematic sexuality, IOW incest, of their minor children. By putting their children at risk by allowing a pervert to be privy to these offences they have basically and simply participated in real time, not filmed, child *advertiser censored*, IMO. Of course they would never see it that way. Oh no.

And so we have Jared, just like the Duggars working himself into a brand, getting into children big time,
making everyone think he's something special, rakes in the cash and then disappoints everyone by hurting those children.
Nothing to do except keep locking them up and throw that key!
.:jail: or :bang:

 

[Ixchel13]

sorry if this has been posted. People magazine. http://www.people.com/article/jared...vertiser censored*-sex-1.4-million-14-victims

''former subway pitchman jared fogle has admitted that he had sex with at least two minors and obtained child *advertiser censored* of 12 other children as young as 6 years old, according to shocking federal court documents released today. '''

sorry, but no reason to want child *advertiser censored* of children 6 yrs old if you like them just barely below legal age. Doesn't work that way.
Poor babies. All of these kids just make me want to cry just imagining all of the lost kids and scrolling through the list of names in my head and wondering
will any of them be found after the fbi is through looking at these images? Nightmare for the babies .

bbm omg.

 

[seattlechiquita]

I've never liked Jared. And this is after he was a regular
customer, I mean every week, at my restaurant for years, this was beginning right when he was starting the foundation. And to get home here in BTown, I would pass the subway he lived above every day.
He gave off creepy vibes. When I said that, people would actually diss me, it was like I was saying Santa was a **** or Mother Teresa was a ho. And why? Guy's claim to fame was losing weight, big whoop!

Scarlett, I know you wondered upthread if there was a bit of a difference from actually abusing a child and "merely" watching the child *advertiser censored*. Perhaps. You said that before Jared was arrested and is now going to plead guilty. Now that he has proven to be a craven, hypocritical,heinously depraved pervert, does that answer your question?
I'm not saying it rudely, I am being genuine, because
people like Jared, and the Duggars, sometimes receive some sort of special consideration and it takes a long time for people to come around to their guilt. IMO.

Although the Duggars haven't AS YET been linked to child *advertiser censored*; they are friends with, associate with, and have utilized the counsel of a known child pornographer
and to actually deal with the problematic sexuality, IOW incest, of their minor children. By putting their children at risk by allowing a pervert to be privy to these offences they have basically and simply participated in real time, not filmed, child *advertiser censored*, IMO. Of course they would never see it that way. Oh no.

And so we have Jared, just like the Duggars working himself into a brand, getting into children big time,
make everyone think you're something special, rake in the cash and then disappoint everyone by somehow hurting those children.
Nothing to do except keep locking them up and throw that key!
.:jail: or :bang:

I hear you. Just like Sandusky. Perverts of the worst possible kind. Jared, Josh (and his enabling parents), Sandusky (and his enabler boss Paterno and his wife). A special place in hell for all of them.