Yes, Justice4MaryBoyle, that was a MOST interesting 1985 video. What I noticed most what what a hair-trigger temper one of the people suspected of an initial interference in Mary's case has---would NOT want to be on his bad side. And the letter from Mary's twin appears to indicate the publicity surrounding this case is going to to be ratcheted up sooner than later. But, please excuse what may be my thick-headedness, here is what I am unclear about:
It seems we have two issues here: 1) foremost, who killed Mary Boyle and 2) who initiated the roadblock, if any, into the initial, the continuing and the on-going (if any) investigation (realizing reasonable people may disagree as to what constitutes an investigation). So what I am unclear about is how will the pursuit of #2 solve the mystery of #1?
If one of these men suddenly says, 'yes, I made a call because they were barking up the wrong tree', or whatever he (excuse) he gives with regard to a telephonic intervention in the initial investigation---I can see how it would lead to the name of the person whose investigation was halted by a phone call, and yes, that would be corruption, but does it really prove anything about who killed Mary, absent a confession? Or is the hope that pressure will bring about such a confession? The case is nearly 40 years old, McEniff is about 80, and whoever Mary's sister (and others) think is the killer must also be elderly. If being able to put a name to one's suspicions is the payoff, regardless of any charges, then I think many people would feel that's justice served, and many might think it's not.
I guess what I am asking is: What precisely is the goal here in making allegations, even providing vivid proof, of Gardai wrong-doing and corruption in OTHER cases if we cannot be certain it will lead to the beyond-a-shadow-of-a-doubt charge of murder IN THIS CASE for the party guilty of killing Mary?
From the moment I heard about this case, and the film, I wanted the killer brought to justice and the people who gaslighted this case be held on corruption, maybe even as an accessory to murder; what I'm not clear on is how the current campaign will achieve this. I want it to work--do you think it will? Thanks for participating in this forum, despite how difficult it must be for a relative. I hope you take my inquiry in the spirit of support it is intended.