Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just a thought, but could the feet that have washed up in BC belong to victims of Keyes? It is said that he dismembered and dumped bodies in water.
"But the reason why at least 12 human feet have washed up off the Pacific coast of Canada has turned out to be rather more mundane.
Most of the victims were suicides who threw themselves off bridges into the water after which their bodies decomposed naturally, investigators have revealed.
...
Through painstaking work they were able to work out the real story behind the mystery, including the most recent victim which was found on November 5th 2011, which was definitely an accident.
Mr Fonseca told the New York Post that most of the victims jumped from a bridge over the Fraser River, which flows into the Pacific Ocean at Vancouver."
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...d-Pacific-coast-people-committed-suicide.html
"But the reason why at least 12 human feet have washed up off the Pacific coast of Canada has turned out to be rather more mundane.
Most of the victims were suicides who threw themselves off bridges into the water after which their bodies decomposed naturally, investigators have revealed.
...
Through painstaking work they were able to work out the real story behind the mystery, including the most recent victim which was found on November 5th 2011, which was ‘definitely an accident’.
Mr Fonseca told the New York Post that most of the victims jumped from a bridge over the Fraser River, which flows into the Pacific Ocean at Vancouver."
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...d-Pacific-coast-people-committed-suicide.html
"But the reason why at least 12 human feet have washed up off the Pacific coast of Canada has turned out to be rather more mundane.
Most of the victims were suicides who threw themselves off bridges into the water after which their bodies decomposed naturally, investigators have revealed.
...
Through painstaking work they were able to work out the real story behind the mystery, including the most recent victim which was found on November 5th 2011, which was definitely an accident.
Mr Fonseca told the New York Post that most of the victims jumped from a bridge over the Fraser River, which flows into the Pacific Ocean at Vancouver."
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...d-Pacific-coast-people-committed-suicide.html
I really think LE needs to revisit their findings/conclusions in this regard. Unless those people left suicide notes or were actually seen jumping from the bridge then IK can't be ruled out. He said many of his victims were people who really wouldn't be missed or make the news and that one of his victims had their death ruled as an accident.
IMO IK has way more than 11 victims and in the beginning preyed on the weak and vulnerable to practice his "craft". Street people, the homeless, drug users, prostitutes etc. Those who wouldn't be missed or hit the front page of the newspaper. As time progress and he had honed his "skill", I believe he took risks and preyed on more challenging victims... single and in pairs. And, IMO as time passed I believe he took higher profile victims and followed their cases until he was captured.
I wonder how much evidence may be on his computer or on the computers of cafe's and coffee shops, libraries, etc that he may have spent time in that will never be found?
MOO, JMO, IHO
I just finished watching the last video and wonder if the photo he asked to see again at the 1 hr 11 minute mark was of items found either in the boat that was being discussed or at the NY property? The female talks about gun parts right after he looks at the photo but earlier they had been talking about a knife. Did he have a secret compartment in the boat or a cache hidden on the property? Was he was studying the photo to see if that area had been disturbed and realized he was being lied to and that LE had way more info on him than he thought they did? Could the gun parts be traced as belonging to a possible victim from another state?
http://q13fox.com/2013/08/12/fbi-re...ler-in-washington-state-asks-public-for-help/...Investigators believe Keyes did not know any of his victims prior to their abductions, the FBI news release said. He described several remote locations that he frequented to look for victims parks, campgrounds, trailheads, cemeteries, boating areas, etc. ..."
I really don't know where it would be best to post this -- might be more helpful in the "region" threads, where people are actively sleuthing for possible victims among missing persons, but I wouldn't know which "region" thread to choose, so ... posting here.
Remember how IK said that, back when he "was smart", he let the victims come to him, in remote areas? bbm:
http://q13fox.com/2013/08/12/fbi-re...ler-in-washington-state-asks-public-for-help/
Just wondering whether he may have actually taken someone from or near a cemetery? Any persons reported missing under those circumstances?
IK made a point of saying that he did all his" dirty deeds "away from home so that he would not be a suspect. This apparently changed after his attack on SK in his home town.
Could it be that he is lying to protect his wife and child and family/work or anyone/thing else that was important to him?
They say sk's usually begin first kills close to home then as confidence builds, they move outward...