Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I remember the horrific murders of these boys on the news years ago. After seeing the documentaries on HBO years ago, I thought the young men convicted of the murders were found guilty based on literally no evidence & coerced testimonies by "witnesses". The crime scene debacle by the first responders should've been enough not to charge those 3 young men, let alone the incompetence by the WMPD from the very beginning.
Thanks for making me "understand" that I shouldn't believe everything that I see on TV. You mean Gilligan & his boatmates weren't really on a deserted island for several years?You need to understand that you shouldn't believe everything you see on TV. And the "documentaries" are your source of truth...well, what can I say?
Dog, I know if I reply to you that I'll be going down the rabbit hole that you reside. Whee, here I go. FYI, I've read a lot about this case over the years besides viewing the documentaries. There's no evidence that I've seen connecting these 3 men to the murders. Only a coerced confession & some bogus witness testimonies. Oh I forgot about the shenanigans by the Jury Foreman & Judge in the original trial. I guess the State of Arkansas disagrees with me. What? The State released them on an Alford Plea? They wouldn't release child murderers would they. No, no they wouldn't unless they were likely innocent from the get go.
Of course murderers are occasionally released once their sentences are completed. But again these men were released under the Alford Plea. It makes zero difference who approached who regarding the plea. Do you understand the definition of an Alford Plea? Since I disagree with your opinions, then it must be true that I didn't do enough research... according to you. Again, what evidence was there that connected the three men to the murders? You said a lot of words (double talk) about the evidence, but you didn't actually present any. Were there footprints, fingerprints or DNA evidence? So no physical evidence. Did anyone actually see any of these three at the scene where the boys were eventually found deceased? JM was 17, a minor & his IQ was in the low 70's. He was alone when he was questioned by police for up to 12 hours. (Wiki)> "Dr Richard Ofshe testified that the brief recording of JM interrogation was a "classic example" of police coercion. Critics have also stated that JM various "confessions" were in many respects inconsistent with each other, as well as with the particulars of the crime scene and murder victims" Dr Richard Ofshe is an expert on false confessions. So the only evidence they had was the ramblings of a 17 yr old kid (JM) who was most likely coerced by the police. IMO, JM's later rambling with his attorney present was quite strange & that of a person who was delusional.
Dog, do you think it's possible that someone else committed these murders?
Can you enlighten me on his ‘plethora ofI won't attempt to answer your numerous questions because you would merely attempt to debunk anything that I might say. I will address this one:
"Why would somebody exhibit all of the signs of being a psychopath and yet not be one?"
Not all psychopaths are killers. I'm not totally sure that Damien is a psychopath. He certainly has had mental problems in the past, and basically "growing up" in prison certainly left him immature. (The plethora of immature actions he has exhibited since his release proves this.) However, the justice system should not convict a person, and certainly should not sentence a person to death, on such a lack of real evidence as there was in this case. (Jessie could "confess" every day and twice on Sunday and I would not believe it because of his mental disability.) IMO, the reason for the lack of evidence is that Damien, Jason and Jessie are factually innocent of these crimes. I hope that the State of Arkansas reopens this case, that a proper investigation is conducted and that the real killer is punished for his crimes.
I won't attempt to answer your numerous questions because you would merely attempt to debunk anything that I might say. I will address this one:
"Why would somebody exhibit all of the signs of being a psychopath and yet not be one?"
Not all psychopaths are killers. I'm not totally sure that Damien is a psychopath. He certainly has had mental problems in the past, and basically "growing up" in prison certainly left him immature. (The plethora of immature actions he has exhibited since his release proves this.) However, the justice system should not convict a person, and certainly should not sentence a person to death, on such a lack of real evidence as there was in this case. (Jessie could "confess" every day and twice on Sunday and I would not believe it because of his mental disability.) IMO, the reason for the lack of evidence is that Damien, Jason and Jessie are factually innocent of these crimes. I hope that the State of Arkansas reopens this case, that a proper investigation is conducted and that the real killer is punished for his crimes.
Can you enlighten me on his ‘plethora of
DE moved to Salem, MA at one point. I found that disconcerting. He continued to seek attention while the other two did not. His choice of an occupation tends to lend itself to making him less credible, IMO. I still believe that he and the other two are innocent of the murders, but, IMO, DE continues to "act out" in an immature way that causes many to believe him capable of the murders. However, none of his post-conviction actions are proof of his guilt. I hope I live long enough to see the truth come out. Maybe DS's upcoming book will provide some proof! I continue to hope.
I’ve always said that DE was/is his own worst enemy. It was more understandable when he was a teenager, but, even now, his actions DO NOT make him a murderer.