Dog, I know if I reply to you that I'll be going down the rabbit hole that you reside. Whee, here I go. FYI, I've read a lot about this case over the years besides viewing the documentaries. There's no evidence that I've seen connecting these 3 men to the murders. Only a coerced confession & some bogus witness testimonies. Oh I forgot about the shenanigans by the Jury Foreman & Judge in the original trial. I guess the State of Arkansas disagrees with me. What? The State released them on an Alford Plea? They wouldn't release child murderers would they. No, no they wouldn't unless they were likely innocent from the get go.
When you simply parrot the WM3s' fans' talking points, it shows you have in fact, not done any research beyond reading only what fits your narrative.
"There's no evidence I've seen". Exactly - you haven't seen it because you are either in denial, haven't looked past the "documentaries" or are unable to understand the evidence. It's glaring, and there's a LOT of it. I won't dig it up for you - it's all in the court transcripts, and documents on Callahan's. (I'm sure you've read all the files on Callahan's, yes?). The 500 is also an extremely damaging piece of evidence as well. You've read that, right?
"Only a coerced confession". Again - this statement is glaring in its utter inaccuracy. Misskelley confessed not once, but many, many, many times - several POST conviction. First of all, the first confession was not "coerced". His many subsequent confessions were not "coerced" either. He confessed to 2 police officers in their squad car (and sorry, but "they were lying" isn't a defense or proof). He confessed, with his hand on a bible, after his own lawyer BEGGED him not to. He absolutely insisted and said he was going to "make this right". Tell me, how can one be "coerced" into confessing, multiple times, when the people who allegedly coerced him, aren't even in the room? How does someone continue to confess, AFTER they've been convicted of the crime, despite the pleas and insistence of their own lawyer that they NOT? How does one confess and give details to the crime that were NOT public knowledge? How does an innocent person keep on confessing over and over and over? I'll tell you the answer to all of those questions: Because they did it.
"Bogus witness testimony" - well, that means nothing, that's just a "bogus" talking point you threw out because you've heard other supporters tow that line. There were MANY witnesses, in different capacities, who maintained their testimony and would have absolutely zero reason to perjure themselves.
Re: the Alford Plea: the DEFENSE approached the prosecution with the idea of them pleading guilty, not the other way around. The WM3 had a new trial coming to them, and they claimed they had "exculpatory evidence" that would point to the "real killer". Instead of taking the new trial and clearing their names and suing the State for millions, they went to the prosecutor and asked to plead guilty. And, shockingly, to this day, they have NEVER released any exculpatory evidence whatsoever. Why? Because it DOESN'T EXIST. What innocent person pleads guilty to child murder, claims to have evidence to clear their name, and never follows through? A guilty person, that's who.
Also, murderers are released from prison all the time.
I suggest you do a little more research before you stand up and defend 3 (twice) convicted child killers.