Iirc that lawyer Barry scheck from the Innocence Project ain't buying that the TDNA exonerates the Ramsey's. Let me see if I can find it in writing somewhere. Brb
Some Barry Scheck quotes from the video:
"... so, we don't know whether that's saliva or what... whether it was skin cells ah, eh you know there was... it could be DNA from the original manufacture uh of the underwear. I know Dr. Henry Lee went out and bought underwear of the same kind then took it out of a plastic wrapper and took a cutting and extracted DNA and got some profiles from it so I mean it's a little unclear..."
"I've seen a lot of press reports about fingernail scrapings and ah I don't think those are really a factor from what I recall"
...""I've seen a lot of press reports about fingernail scrapings and ah I don't think those are really a factor from what I recall"
"...there was always a belief that the DNA that was found in this case could have come from extraneous sources, that's always been a possibility."
"...it could be DNA from the original manufacture uh of the underwear."
You may not agree with Barry Scheck on these points, but at least his words show that those who do not believe the DNA is related in this case are not ignoring evidence.
This would not be the first time that tertiary DNA was found in a murder case.
Interview with Innocence Project's Barry Scheck, author of "Actual Innocence" about DNA in this case.(During John Mark Karr incident):
http://www.nacdl.org/public.nsf/multimedia/Mu ...
listed under
"Barry Scheck on JonBenet DNA"