JusticeJunkie
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2013
- Messages
- 5,107
- Reaction score
- 2
Ooooh, sorry. I just thought of another question.
Yesterday Arias stated as fact the reason her childhood friend refused to testify was because of threats.
The judge left the portion the DT wanted stated to the jurors off, but then Arias states it. It sems to be something Jan was unable to tell the other side of the story. Is that true?
If so, why was Arias allowed to bring up something Juan had no legal way to correct?
Could have Arias disclosed conversations that took placed behind closed door hearings?
Could she have said she thought JS was biased?
ECT.
What exactly WERE her limits?
Yesterday Arias stated as fact the reason her childhood friend refused to testify was because of threats.
The judge left the portion the DT wanted stated to the jurors off, but then Arias states it. It sems to be something Jan was unable to tell the other side of the story. Is that true?
If so, why was Arias allowed to bring up something Juan had no legal way to correct?
Could have Arias disclosed conversations that took placed behind closed door hearings?
Could she have said she thought JS was biased?
ECT.
What exactly WERE her limits?