Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think Sky is to blame. They were both adults. It isn't Sky's "fault" that two consenting adults had sex in her home.
And she did say in the 48 hours show that she was disappointed in Travis' behavior with Jodi. And Chris gave her a "look", IIRC.
Sky is not to blame for Jodi killing Travis nor for Travis having sex with Jodi. MOO.
Just had a thought to expand on the feeling something one moment...
At the breakdown of my marriage my ex went into full scale scary stalker mode. For weeks he cyber-stalked me pretending to be people online he obviously wasn't, emailing my friends the 'truth' about me...and also physically stalking. I would go into a store and come out to find him in the parking lot, he'd show up at my house and just stand across the street looking in my window, call at all hours to make sure I was home, etc.
His threats to kill me also amped up. One day, out of sheer exhaustion and frustration, I started screaming at him if he was going to do it to just get on with it already - in public. At the time I meant it. I was so angry, so tired, and just so sick of the threats.
Days, weeks, and months later I processed those feelings. I was able to rationalize that I didn't really mean that, of course, but those emotions were indeed very real and borne from the helplessness and frustration I felt at the time. Further, later I was even able to put into context how dangerous and foolish my actions had been.
But had anyone asked me at the time what I'd meant I would have sworn it was exactly what I'd said. FWIW
Re-watching Jodi's testimony on NG. Nurmi is going to have a talk with Jodi tonight, I'll bet.
"Can't you make it sound worse than that?????? Don't you see what I am trying to get you to say?????" Thank God Jodi has no emotional intuition.
Also watching NG.At least NG seems to have Jodi's dirty little number. Noooo, don't ask "jinxasaurus"!
One of the defense attorneys today on IS that knows Juan said to wait and see.........he is going to introduce some evidence in his rebuttal that we havent heard about yet.:great:
He said JM has been around Jodi for 4 years and knows what makes her tick. He knew she would be testifying because she loves to be the center of attention. So all this time he has been preparing and this prosecutor is one of the most prepared attorneys Ive ever seen. He doesnt even use notes. Awesome and amazing.
So I cant wait for the bombshell evidence to come forward if we ever get past JA being on her soap box. It may start when Juan begins to cross her just like he did the Law and Order moment with Darryl about the two gas cans she got from him.
imo
Wishbone, we only have Jodi's word that they had sex there. I take it with a huge grain of salt.
Lisa never testified she felt groped or pressured. If you watch her testimony with defense she is uncomfortable. With RM, he permits her to explain what she meant in the email. Young women who have had no experience with men in a situation where there is heavy petting are often not prepared for what is a natural reaction in men. That was her problem. She thought he could control it. He never asked for sex, never pressure her and she admitted that she was the aggressor and he stopped it before it progressed. It's all there but you have to listen to the cross. RM is very fast so it's just a couple of minutes and he gets right to the point. Probably the same amount of time to listen to it as it would be to write a post. It's very interesting. jmo
Bombshell!!Nancy Grace just said *advertiser censored* yep, I'm giggling like a 12 yr old LOL
Also watching NG.
Curious why the women jurors are on the edge of their seats during this testimony......
:waitasec:
i think napolean was in the car :waitasec:
Reading all the posts and realizing that there are so many different views and bantering back and forth among viewers truly worries me. If we viewers have such polarizing views, imagine what will go on during deliberations.....and all it takes is 1 out of 12 and a mistrial is declared. True, she has yet to be subject to cross, but "there's one in every crowd." You can convince some of the people some of the time.........etc.
I can only speak to myself but I'll give it a shot.
First let me say the demonizing of either JA or TA just doesn't fly with me. TA made moves on women he dated? BFD so did I. So do most males in the heat of the moment. He had sex before marriage which went against his religious principles? So did I and I'm Catholic. I was conflicted just as TA was but I repented and feel forgiven and if that's the worst thing TA did No big deal. In short I feel sympathy for TA because he is a murder victim. All the sex talk means nothing to me as for guilt or innocence.
As for JA, I feel the same "meh" about her re: the sex. I think they were two adults caught up in the lust that comes into play in a lot of budding relationships. If I were a juror all this testimony would be meaningless.
Another thing is I don't see JA as being able to charm the men on the jury. She is not that "hot" or alluring in my eyes.
Having said all that, I will admit it is more difficult for most of us men to see a woman as pure evil unless she has horns growing from her head.
Does that make any sense?
Yes the 2 piecers came about in the last 20 years . . . . (scandalous!)
I thought that was a caller who called in and said she was on the edge of her seat watching Jodi.
I would have enjoyed watching paint dry more than the past two days of monotone and boring JA. She even makes sex boring.
IMO