the guest TH just said the same thing I've been saying all along. This trial is not about guilt/not. It's about the degree of guilt she will be found guilty of. Will Jodi get life or death?
Jodi is GUILTY of murdering Travis. That's a given.
The defense keywords of the day:
' Suicidal Fog'
' Pure Wrath'
What was the Shakespeare play JA invited a deceased Travis to see? Wonder if that's where plucked the word wrath from.
Wrath, wrath, wrath, wrath. Enough already!
they sound like heavy metal band names :rocker:
pg #119/132 from TA to JA
I freaking bet - I wonder how much you send out that I don' see .. . btw thanks for not paying for the car . . . you are more and more like your Mom every day
mistakes ja admitted to this morning:
- left a drawing at tas by mistake that really upset ta
- her computer failed after she worked on wedding photos and before she could work on tas dog photo
- sent a text to ta by mistake instead of to stevec
- sam, steve, abe, [dick and harry] :crazy:
ITA and the difference between Nurms and Juan in direct will be so significant for the jury. IMO whether Juan is extremely aggressive with JA at times or not, his style is so much more effective in this case. He is to the point, no filler, no "fluff", blunt. ESPECIALLY after weeks of Nurmi's slow irrelevant drivel and JA's pointless narrations, I'm guessing the jury will welcome what Juan is going to do.
There's no comparision.
No wonder Travis told her - "Everything you touch turns to sh..!"
She thoroughly enjoyed getting a reaction from him.I don't blame Travis in the least for being rude to her in these text messages. She asked for it with her obsessive behavior- she wouldn't leave him alone! And he had her number- he was beginning to figure out that she was a manipulative liar and told her so! She didn't take a hint. She's extremely passive-aggressive.
That is the reality. (I hope).
But technically, if she successfully proves self defense, she would be found not guilty of murder and could walk.
I want to repeat that because I have seen a lot of confusion about that.
Trying to see this like a juror would and the bottom line so far is there has been no corroborating testimony from anyone that Travis was physically abusive towards her.
In fact, just the opposite, he was mainly nice. He did say some mean things to her when he was mad at her, but after hearing the tape the other day and seeing some texts, she is always there egging him on and being part of the verbal exchanges.
So far, it is just her word about physical abuse and the tape went a long way to convince me she is lynig and twisting everything to always be Travis caused it. The fact she takes no responsibllity shows me she is lying. Everyone would have some degree of involvment in exchanges, but according to her, she NEVER is part of any of the bad words, so that is BS to me.
I hope the jury sees her lies as clear as they are to me.
HINT TO JURY. She looks down, voice gets quiet, etc. Hint that she is beginning to lie about something.
btw- My dog is part chihuahua and she's thoroughly offended by JA comparing herself to a shaking scared little chi. She grunted a little growl when HLN replayed a "highlight" this weekend and I'm pretty sure this morning she was trying to give JA the finger, which is hard for a dog with paws.
Even the pups despise this defendant.