That's very close to what I'm saying. You could have a disorganized offender who premeditated murder but that is not who he is presenting us with to prove premeditation.
He is presenting us with a highly organized offender who is premeditating murder with a gun who then becomes highly disorganized when she commits murder with a different weapon.
[On the face of it, the highly disorganized crime scene in this case bolsters her claim of self defense. It looks impulsive, spur of the moment]
He says, I can prove to you she preplanned this murder because she stole a gun to kill him. And, more than that, liscense plates, cellphones, gas cans, receipts, lost receipts, everything fits to show a compulsively orgainized killer sneaking into Arizona to kill him in a premeditated fashion.
And then he turns around and says, I can prove to you that she used a knife to kill him and left behind a total mess.
well, he is trying to have it both ways. If she planned to kill him with a knife, prove it. If she planned to kill him with a gun, prove she killed him with a gun.
Is she organized? Disorganized? Planned? Spontaneous? What?
He's talking about two different perps.
IMO
What about the scene is disorganized? He has shown that she brought both weapons used to kill him. Wounds from both weapons would have been fatal. It just happens that the cutting of the throat is the quickest death.