RealityMan
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2013
- Messages
- 343
- Reaction score
- 0
I added a couple more slides to my reconstruction. I also added some clarification on how I see the body movements in slide #3.
Counting the tiles and following the tile grouting, I've oriented the crime scene photos in these new slides with respect to the position of Jodi's foot in the 'foot' photo, as well as the last known position of the camera.
The death scene and blood trails make sense to me, but I've struggled a bit over the location of the camera for the final 'dragging' photo. Clearly the body is being dragged from left to right in the photo. But we also know that the body is being dragged away from the carpet and toward the bathroom. Therefore, the camera must be up against the wall, as depicted in the last slide. There's no other way for the body to be appearing to go from left to right and still match the blood trail up the hallway toward the bathroom.
Unless... the forensics guy inadvertently reversed the image during recovery from the memory card....
The last photo is maddening, as the angles don't look quite right and the photo is so grainy. But I do think the body is quite close to the camera, so its possible that the camera is up against the wall. Remember, we are only seeing a small portion of Travis' body, so it is hard to get the perspective of how close it is to the camera. The camera could have been jostled when Jodi is walking backward dragging Travis' body, and then 2 seconds later the camera shoots that final photo. Jodi is no longer visible after the 2 second delay, as she has left the field of view.
Considering the struggle that occurred following the 'foot' photo, it seems highly unlikely that the camera was not kicked to a new location. In the 'foot' photo, it stood squarely between the participants and the carpet. If the struggle occurred as depicted in slide #2, there would have been kinetic energy on the opposite side of the camera (the blood smear wall), so it would make sense that the camera would be kicked in the direction of the opposite wall, putting it in position to snap a photo of the body being dragged from left to right, away from the carpet.
What do you guys think??
Dave
Hey Dave, thanks for putting these pictures together.
A couple of thoughts:
* I think JA delivers the neck slash either before or after both of the last two photos. In other words, I don't think it's possible that, after the first bleeding photo, TA makes a final lunge toward the carpet, falls face first, has his neck cut, and is then dragged back toward the bathroom in the last photo. There are a couple of reasons I believe this is not possible: (1) the position of TA's foot suggests that he is completely unconscious in the first bleeding photo. I understand that it is possible that TA just lost all feeling in his lower body, and is still able to move his upper body, but I think he would need to use his legs to make the final lunge you are describing; and (2) the bleeding shown in the last two photos is almost identical. Therefore, I don't think any additional injuries have been inflicted upon TA between the two photos. If the neck slash had been dealt between the two photos, I would expect a significant difference in the appearance of the blood streaking down TA's back between the photos.
* I don't think the camera is kicked to the opposite wall. It makes more sense to me that the camera is positioned in almost the same spot as in the previous photo. All that has changed is the orientation of the camera. It has been rotated to the right by about 45-90 degrees. Note: rotation of the camera to the right is consistent with TA's body bumping the camera as JA drags his body toward the bedroom in the 76 seconds between the photos. Or perhaps JA bumped the camera as she went around TA's body to grab his arms. I think the only explanation for the position of TA's back in the last photo is JA is grabbing both of his arms and pulling on TA toward the bathroom. I don't think TA is fighting at all here.
Also, in my opinion, the blood we are seeing streaking down TA's back is the remainder of the blood from TA's body after the neck slash has been dealt. That is a lot of blood streaking down, and I don't think there is any other injury on TA's body that could explain that kind of bleeding. Also, I think the ME implied during his testimony that he believed the blood streaking down was coming from the neck wound. So, with regard to the last two photos, I'm a neck-slash-firster. That is, I believe JA delivers the neck slash before the last two photos, but not before the gunshot.
As for why TA's body is positioned closer to the bedroom in the last bleeding photo than in the previous photo taken 76 seconds before, I think JA might've just been wrestling with TA's body to get it into a better dragging position and ended up moving TA slightly toward the bedroom before dragging him back to the bathroom.
In conclusion, I think the sequence is something like this: (1) JA drops the camera in the hallway. (2) JA slashes TA's neck. (3) TA bleeds out partially on the carpet area. (4) JA starts dragging TA toward the bathroom. (5) While wrestling with TA's body, JA accidentally bumps the camera twice, capturing the last two photos.