Estelle
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2009
- Messages
- 6,727
- Reaction score
- 18,382
http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/694...steenkamp-death-trial-to-begin-again-june-30/
Two things which struck me about this article are:
1. Did Vorster go too far?
Legal analysts said the defense team’s decision to introduce Vorster’s testimony may have backfired. John Welch, former deputy director of South Africa’s public prosecuting authority, said Pistorius’ lawyers may have called the psychiatrist to the stand at such a late stage in the trial to “remedy” the athlete’s own testimony, which has been viewed as unconvincing. But in testifying that Pistorius was anxious, felt vulnerable to crime and may not have intended to kill Steenkamp, Vorster possibly “went too far” in her description of the psychiatric disorder, according to Welch.
2. There could be a two month delay
After his tests, the experts who assess Pistorius would take additional time to compile a report and submit it to the court. That could take another month, raising the possibility of a two-month delay in the trial.
Two things which struck me about this article are:
1. Did Vorster go too far?
Legal analysts said the defense team’s decision to introduce Vorster’s testimony may have backfired. John Welch, former deputy director of South Africa’s public prosecuting authority, said Pistorius’ lawyers may have called the psychiatrist to the stand at such a late stage in the trial to “remedy” the athlete’s own testimony, which has been viewed as unconvincing. But in testifying that Pistorius was anxious, felt vulnerable to crime and may not have intended to kill Steenkamp, Vorster possibly “went too far” in her description of the psychiatric disorder, according to Welch.
2. There could be a two month delay
After his tests, the experts who assess Pistorius would take additional time to compile a report and submit it to the court. That could take another month, raising the possibility of a two-month delay in the trial.