Kathi Belich as a Defense Witness? Seriously?

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Baez filed a Motion with his good cause for listing the new witnesses: http://www.wesh.com/download/2011/0216/26889138.pdf (thanks Cherishtoo!)

This is what he says about Kathi:

"Kathleen Belich also known as Kathleen Gallager was listed to rebut witnesses just listed by the State involving an investigation launched against Laura Buchanan. She is also a witness involving State witness Maya Derkovich. (While the State has recently infonned the defense that they have not illtention to call Maya Derkovich as a witness, the defense has not ruled out calling her)"
 
NoNameLeft said:
Baez filed a Motion with his good cause for listing the new witnesses: http://www.wesh.com/download/2011/0216/26889138.pdf (thanks Cherishtoo!)

This is what he says about Kathi:

"Kathleen Belich also known as Kathleen Gallager was listed to rebut witnesses just listed by the State involving an investigation launched against Laura Buchanan. She is also a witness involving State witness Maya Derkovich. (While the State has recently infonned the defense that they have not illtention to call Maya Derkovich as a witness, the defense has not ruled out calling her)"
Click to expand...

He has outdone himself in the childish motions department. What a whiny piece of wah wah wah this waste of paper was. No law cited. Right off the bat a jab at "despite daily contact" the State blah blah. He whines that the State continues to file discovery. Well, the judge knew that. LDB said no, she wouldn't stop doing her job. CJP did not say well you have to...he obviously agrees with her. ANd the "otherwise known as Kathleen Gallagher" goes back to a childish video where he taunted her "is your real name Gallagher? Is your real name Kathleen Gallagher?" :banghead::banghead:

ETA: http://www.wftv.com/video/19802341/index.html

I think this is the video where he does a great imitation of a teenage girl.
 
NoNameLeft said:
Baez filed a Motion with his good cause for listing the new witnesses: http://www.wesh.com/download/2011/0216/26889138.pdf (thanks Cherishtoo!)

This is what he says about Kathi:

"Kathleen Belich also known as Kathleen Gallager was listed to rebut witnesses just listed by the State involving an investigation launched against Laura Buchanan. She is also a witness involving State witness Maya Derkovich. (While the State has recently infonned the defense that they have not illtention to call Maya Derkovich as a witness, the defense has not ruled out calling her)"
Click to expand...

Wonder how many people believe that?
 
The latest witness added to the state was Julie Davis. Who must be rebutting some of LB's statements. But, who is she? And what does Kathi Belich know about her that she herself becomes a witness?

IOW...did our own KB get to her first, before the defense did? And they are crying out loud again?
 
So Baez is going to USE Kenneth D to prove the diary was written in 2003????
Even though it has been proven the Journal wasn't manufactured and sold until 2004.
 
NoNameLeft said:
Baez filed a Motion with his good cause for listing the new witnesses: http://www.wesh.com/download/2011/0216/26889138.pdf (thanks Cherishtoo!)

This is what he says about Kathi:

"Kathleen Belich also known as Kathleen Gallager was listed to rebut witnesses just listed by the State involving an investigation launched against Laura Buchanan. She is also a witness involving State witness Maya Derkovich. (While the State has recently infonned the defense that they have not illtention to call Maya Derkovich as a witness, the defense has not ruled out calling her)"
Click to expand...

What does Kathy Belich have to do with an investigation into LB? What does LB's tampering investigation have to do with Casey's trial? Does JB really want to open that can of worms during trial?

As for Maya... Maya has been on the witness list for a while. JB should have had Kathy on the witness list before the deadline. I just don't see how this isn't a simple case of bullying on the part of the defense. They have no intentions of ever calling Kathy as a witness.
 
Intermezzo said:
So Baez is going to USE Kenneth D to prove the diary was written in 2003????
Even though it has been proven the Journal wasn't manufactured and sold until 2004.
Click to expand...

Shhhh I don't think he noticed that yet. JWG didn't point it out to him.
 
LolaMoon08 said:
What does Kathy Belich have to do with an investigation into LB? What does LB's tampering investigation have to do with Casey's trial? Does JB really want to open that can of worms during trial?

As for Maya... Maya has been on the witness list for a while. JB should have had Kathy on the witness list before the deadline. I just don't see how this isn't a simple case of bullying on the part of the defense. They have no intentions of ever calling Kathy as a witness.
Click to expand...

BBM That's what I was wondering..they're two different issues. I bet the State has whoever he was talking about on their witness list for a completely different reason than the tampering investigation. Cuz they're two different investigations!!!!
 
Solace said:
Is this going to be on Court TV? Anyone know? I want every day of this trial - Every day and I am willing to buy TIVO if need be. I have to have it. Wish I had the Betty Broderick case on tape - that was great. Peterson, just okay. This will be incredible. Imo.

Court TV???
Click to expand...

TruTv has stated on Several occasions that they would air it .
 
logicalgirl said:
That doesn't make sense to me - the other stations have been just as rough in the last month as Kathy has ever been. And more consistently critical this past month also.

Why keep just Kathy out? It must be some specific information she has or they think she has. Didn't she do that Maya (sp?) expose a while back, because she is also one of the new witnesses they want to add.
Click to expand...

You were right about Maya D., I'm confused about what she could possibly have to add about LB investigation though..
 
More of Baez's pitiful whining act...."the State gets to, so why can't I?" :banghead:

Seriously he is just playing games at this point, making a mockery of the judicial system and trying to have KB listed as a witness to keep her out of court. Plain and simple, he is playing GAMES!!!!
 
I really want to see the hearing for this...I hope we don't have to wait til March!
 
Trapshooter said:
More of Baez's pitiful whining act...."the State gets to, so why can't I?" :banghead:

Seriously he is just playing games at this point, making a mockery of the judicial system and trying to have KB listed as a witness to keep her out of court. Plain and simple, he is playing GAMES!!!!
Click to expand...

The good news is I'm sure she has very good legal representation via the TV Station and they can deal with JB and his nonsense pretty quickly.
It is a good indicator of how scared of her he and CM are, isn't it?
They want anyone who will shine a bright light on their shady dealings removed.
 
Okkkkkkkkk...I just read today's defense motion to strike state's motion to strike...who's on first...motion to help our client because she's gonna fry pleading. What a sloppy piece of work, number one. And...number two, JB is such a baby. This circus is spiraling downward daily. This trial is going to be the biggest slam dunk of century.

JB also laid out his reasoning for KB on the witness list and it does have to do with the interview with the jailhouse snitch.
 
The law that AZ mentioned gives journalists privelege where they do not have to be a witness if their testimony can be obtained elsewhere. Any volunteers? Seriously, she interviewed her ON THE NEWS. Publicly.
 
strawberry said:
I really want to see the hearing for this...I hope we don't have to wait til March!
Click to expand...

Alas, next week is Jose's "Unique Opportunity" with his experts in Chicago.

Hope he's not planning to rent a car. :floorlaugh:
 
TotallyObsessed said:
Okkkkkkkkk...I just read today's defense motion to strike state's motion to strike...who's on first...motion to help our client because she's gonna fry pleading. What a sloppy piece of work, number one. And...number two, JB is such a baby. This circus is spiraling downward daily. This trial is going to be the biggest slam dunk of century.

JB also laid out his reasoning for KB on the witness list and it does have to do with the interview with the jailhouse snitch.
Click to expand...

ITA! Where did you go to read the motion? I wanna see more ineptitude from the Defense. :) Have to get my daily dose of incompetence from JB & Co. :great:
 
Is ridicidunk a word? Because it keeps going through my head for some reason.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 149 more.
Total: 491 (members: 150, guests: 341)

Online statistics

Members online
150
Guests online
341
Total visitors
491
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
609,381
Messages
18,253,477
Members
234,648
Latest member
WhereTheWildThingsAre
Back
Top